Primis1
join:2005-06-13
Coldwater, MI | reply to b10010011
Re: Simple Solution That's because an AT&T building there was literally burning for a while, and a lot of landlines and cablesystems were knocked out entirely from it. That was a fun day to work for AT&T |
|
b10010011Whats a Posting tag?
join:2004-09-07
Bellingham, WA Reviews:
 ·Comcast Formerl..
3 edits | said by Primis1:That's because an AT&T building there was literally burning for a while, and a lot of landlines and cablesystems were knocked out entirely from it. That was a fun day to work for AT&T Nope not the emergency I was talking about.
This »www.historylink.org/essays/outpu···_id=5468 is the emergency I was refering to. No telephone lines, cable lines, AT&T buildings, or cel towers were involved. But every celphone provider was useless simply because the system was overloaded. |
|
tperl
join:2005-11-15
Columbus, OH | I did not have a cell phone back in 1999. |
|
b10010011Whats a Posting tag?
join:2004-09-07
Bellingham, WA Reviews:
·Comcast Formerl..
| said by tperl:I did not have a cell phone back in 1999. Neither did I, now you do, I do and pretty much everyone else does too. Thats just going to lead to cel-system overload even faster in times of emergency |
|
 NOCManMacChatterPremium
join:2004-09-30
Colorado Springs, CO | reply to Primis1
Ah so the outage in Texas was related to that fire eh..
Could of swore Ma Bell said it was something else lol.
--
FIOS chat »www.fioschat.com MacChatter »www.macchatter.com |
|
 tiger72SexaT duorPPremium
join:2001-03-28
Saint Louis, MO
kudos:1 | reply to b10010011
they also have more capacity nowadays... |
|
| reply to tperl
said by tperl:I did not have a cell phone back in 1999. I did. This is a fun game. I did not have cell phone in 1995. |
|
