<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Regulation to prevent regulation, no? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r16856869</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 07:46:17 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 07:46:17 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Regulation to prevent regulation, no?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16856869</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/500454"><b>Raptor</b></A> : That little PDF pamphlet speaks of how well the Internet has done without regulation, and that the government stepping in to impose what the see fit could do no good. <br><br>But isn't the whole idea of net neutrality 'regulation' the prevention of anyone imposing their own regulations on specific traffic?  <br><br>Is it not like making a rule that says no specific rules allowed? (in a nutshell of course)<br><br>Seems like a big play on words if you ask me.<br><SMALL>--<br>....where's my fiber?</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16856869</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 10:45:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
