<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Sad in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r16858143</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:09:06 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:09:06 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Sad</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16858143</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Was net neutrality all just a bunch of MUMBO JUMBO?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16858143</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 18:07:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Sad</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16856832</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/185013"><b>jwardl</b></A> : This is all really amusing... I saw an anti-neutrality commercial the other day trying to impress how neutrality is, get this, *bad* for the consumer! What a crock.<br><br>The industry wants to essentially DOUBLE CHARGE sites for providing their information, which will, of course, lead to new and increased fees -- and yet, it's BAD for consumers?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16856832</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Sep 2006 10:39:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
