<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Don&#x27;t see any NUMBERS backing Burstein&#x27;s guesses in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r16898277</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 06:01:37 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 06:01:37 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Don&#x27;t see any NUMBERS backing Burstein&#x27;s guesses</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16898277</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>TKJunkMail</b></A> : Well, I read the Burstein article, and I don't see any numbers backing his 25 cents estimate. I did see a lot of statements like "I'd guess", "I don't have enough data", "probably", the "actual costs for any given network will be different", etc. And while the UK Report claimed cost of $39 is high, I see nothing in Burstein's column to back up his claims either.<br><SMALL>--<br>--<BR><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/8n9wl">Join Red Room Forum</A><BR><A HREF="http://tkjunkmail.blogspot.com">BLOG tkjunkmail.blogspot.com</A><BR><A HREF="http://tkjunkmail.googlepages.com">My Web Page</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16898277</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 21:05:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
