 OmegaDisplaced OhioanPremium
join:2002-07-30
Cheyenne, WY | reply to Karl Bode
Re: I can already hear the conversation said by Karl Bode: quote:
It isn't the job of a business to be a welfare agency for people who make bad decisions.
But it is their job to take advantage of the elderly by over-charging them for services? I guess that's where we differ. I like justice. 61 years of age in 1985.
Hardly elderly. (even in 1985).
She simply isn't a smart shopper. It is her fault, let her pay.
--
My site
CT Profile 60 NE Hunter |
|
Host:
Road Runner
PC gaming GAMES
PC gaming Tech
1 edit | Assume she wasn't senile, she was simply foolish. That advocates taking advantage of idiots. I don't support that either, though this entire country is founded on it and many here apparently applaud it as a virtue.
How unfashionable pointing out right and wrong has become. |
|
RadioDoc58ef2c0Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11 | How gratuitous your insults have become. |
|
|
|
 John GaltForward, MarchPremium
join:2004-09-30
Happy Camp
kudos:3 | reply to Karl Bode
said by Karl Bode:How unfashionable pointing out right and wrong has become. I am fascinated by what you consider to be "wrong"...
A legally operating for-profit company provides a service at a clearly specified price that a customer willingly subscribes to and is free to discontinue at ANY time with no penalty...and this is somehow wrong.
Maybe she LIKED the phone...eh?
--
A is A |
|
1 edit | quote:
I am fascinated by what you consider to be "wrong"...
Taking advantage of people is morally muddy to you, huh? |
|
Host:
Road Runner
PC gaming GAMES
PC gaming Tech
2 edits | reply to RadioDoc
Yeah I'm totally out of control. Sometimes I just flare up like a rash and start attacking people virtually, frequently for no reason. I think it's personally some kind of displaced aggression because I have serious emotional issues. I'm not sure. |
|
John GaltForward, MarchPremium
join:2004-09-30
Happy Camp
kudos:3 | reply to Karl Bode
said by Karl Bode:Taking advantage of people is muddy to you, huh? You have failed to point out how she was "taken advantage of"...you have simply expressed your opinion.
--
A is A |
|
John GaltForward, MarchPremium
join:2004-09-30
Happy Camp
kudos:3 | reply to Karl Bode
said by Karl Bode:Yeah I'm totally out of control. Sometimes I just flare up like a rash and start attacking people virtually. I think it's personally some kind of displaced aggression because I have serious emotional issues. I'm not sure.
--
A is A |
|
Host:
Road Runner
PC gaming GAMES
PC gaming Tech
1 edit | reply to John Galt
$14,000 being too much to charge old people for a rotary phone is not an "opinion". Discussing anything reasonably with free-marketeers and their endless moral relativism is like boxing clouds.
Companies could be selling puppy heads to the autistic as a cure for autism and you'd all be making excuses about how they deserved it. |
|
John GaltForward, MarchPremium
join:2004-09-30
Happy Camp
kudos:3 | said by Karl Bode:$14,000 being too much to charge old people for a rotary phone is not an "opinion". Discussing anything reasonably with free-marketeers and their endless moral relativism is like boxing clouds. It is really more about "free will"...she was free to do whatever she wanted, she did what she did and now there is a "big uproar".
--
A is A |
|
 Michieru2zzz zzz zzzPremium
join:2005-01-28
Miami, FL | reply to Karl Bode
Can you blame a stupid person? No
It just can't believe nobody told her to "just go buy a phone they come free with the plan."
Unless she is locked up in her home and has never seen the world or the street for that matter.
You can't blame a company for someone's ignorance. Taking advantage not likely it was a service they provided probably long ago and she still wants it. She never called and say "I want to cancel".
So if she had no problem with paying monthly for a phone, how can that be "taking advantage" of someone? |
|
Host:
Road Runner
PC gaming GAMES
PC gaming Tech
1 edit | reply to John Galt
"She" is one of 750,000. And I'm willing to bet that if we fleshed out the numbers and dug into backgrounds, we'd find a massive portion of them to be elderly people on fixed incomes whose bills get paid automatically.
There is a conscious effort to take advantage of this segment. Either it's right, or it's wrong.
I don't like it, you think it's neat-o. |
|
Host:
Road Runner
PC gaming GAMES
PC gaming Tech
1 edit | reply to Michieru2
quote:
You can't blame a company for someone's ignorance
When they take advantage of them, can I call it sleazy? Will I need a permission slip to do so? And I'd bet the 750,000 are a blend of senile and foolish. Am I to applaud the milking of them (And $14k for a rotary phone is milking) as some kind of pleasant success story? |
|
John GaltForward, MarchPremium
join:2004-09-30
Happy Camp
kudos:3 | reply to Karl Bode
said by Karl Bode:I don't like it, you think it's neat-o. I think that it is up to them to do whatever they want to do...and if that includes "ignoring" something like the cost of the telephone, so be it.
--
A is A |
|
| So basically your position is: screw them. Good old American empathy.
And what if some of these 750,000 people are senile? |
|
 N3OGHYo Soy Col. "Bat" GuanoPremium
join:2003-11-11
Philly burbs
kudos:1 | reply to Karl Bode
said by Karl Bode:$14,000 being too much to charge old people for a rotary phone is not an "opinion". Discussing anything reasonably with free-marketeers and their endless moral relativism is like boxing clouds. Companies could be selling puppy heads to the autistic as a cure for autism and you'd all be making excuses about how they deserved it. I can see if she wasn't told she could buy her own phone from Wal-Mart, or wasn't given notice she could purchase her old rotary phone from the phone company, but I doubt that was the case.
My grandmother leased her old rotary wall phone from Bell Atlantic (now Verizon) until the day she died. We told her over and over again she could just buy the thing outright, and never pay the fee again.
She repeatedly refused. She liked the fact that if the phone ever broke, or needed to be replaced, the phone company would come out and fix it for "free". As much as we explained it to her (the fact that she was paying more than it would cost to replace the phone over and over again) she refused.
I hardly think my grandmother (and I'm not making this up) was taken advantage of. She made a choice to enjoy the "security" that came with leasing the equipment.
I'm gonna bet that if the government steeped in and told the phone company they had to give these phones to these "victims", some advocacy group would step in and say they're robbing these seniors of their "security blanket"
--
Never ask what sort of a computer a guy drives. If he's a Mac user, he'll tell you. If not, why embarrass him? -Tom Clancy |
|
 wifi4milezBig Russ, 1918 to 2008. Rest in Peace
join:2004-08-07
New York, NY | reply to Karl Bode
said by Karl Bode:$14,000 being too much to charge old people for a rotary phone is not an "opinion". Discussing anything reasonably with free-marketeers and their endless moral relativism is like boxing clouds. Companies could be selling puppy heads to the autistic as a cure for autism and you'd all be making excuses about how they deserved it. And what exactly are you suggesting they should have done? Clearly you cant expect that AT&T would/should have contacted all 40 million customers by phone in 1985 and told them they no longer needed to rent their phones, are you?? If so, that is the most ludicrous thing I have ever heard. As was mentioned numerous times already the "rental fee" is clearly listed on her phone bill that she was paying for the past 40+ years. As a middle aged person in 1985, she was more than capable of deciding not to continue renting the phones from AT&T, and MANY retail stores started selling replacement phones between then and now. MANY people today (including you and I) are paying fees and charges that they might not need to, but that is THEIR responsibility, certainly not the governments. I guarantee you that if I reviewed every single bill and charge for everything I have ever bought I could have found ways to do it cheaper, but thats just life.
--
я люблю медведей! |
|
Host:
Road Runner
PC gaming GAMES
PC gaming Tech
| quote:
Clearly you cant expect that AT&T would/should have contacted all 40 million customers by phone in 1985 and told them they no longer needed to rent their phones, are you?? If so, that is the most ludicrous thing I have ever heard.
Do I get to be part of this conversation? Or are you just going to make up my responses and respond to them? |
|
Michieru2zzz zzz zzzPremium
join:2005-01-28
Miami, FL | reply to Karl Bode
You can say what ever you want karl, I don't come here telling people what they should say, I come here to express my opinion like everyone else. So don't talk to me as if I where censoring what you should or should not say.
But let's be realistic here, do you seriously believe these people have not heard or someone told them in regards to all the news of cellphones and plans. Where tons of ads say "buy any sprint/verizon/cingular/at&twireless plan and get a "free" phone.
It's on TV and stuff like this is broadcasted in local channels as well. Immoral on the company end, most likely yes. But if the consumer does not want to switch then how can it be immoral if the consumer is agreeing to paying the phone without complaints.
When I read this story, I think of how uninformed or how people not try to look into new things because they think it's complicated and are already accustomed to using one device and they will stick to that device.
Kind of reminds me of my grandfather which kept on bitching that he did not want XP but wanted windows 98. I forced him into XP because he was so hot headed and eventually turned on his computer and used it with hardly any trouble.
It's nothing to do with being senile, but with being ignorant(at least in my case).
Now my grandfather is running on Xubuntu and has no problems as long as I did the install and what not. |
|
John GaltForward, MarchPremium
join:2004-09-30
Happy Camp
kudos:3 | reply to wifi4milez
said by wifi4milez:Clearly you cant expect that AT&T would/should have contacted all 40 million customers by phone in 1985 and told them they no longer needed to rent their phones, are you?? Actually, they did. You received a notice with your bill that informed you that you had the option of an outright purchase of your telephones. There was information of what services were or were not provided depending on whether or not you did or did not purchase the phone.
I was the proud owner of a Model 2500 touch-tone phone...I really LIKED that phone. It just felt right...not like the crap they sell you today.
--
A is A |
|
