<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Is Norton Net sec 2007 still useing AtGuard? in Security</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r16931847</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 05:59:48 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 05:59:48 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Is Norton Net sec 2007 still useing AtGuard?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16936296</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1014996"><b>ranschultz</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Jrb2 <A HREF="/useremail/u/465492"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>This one:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,15862217">AtGuard Support Forums back online</A><br> </DIV>Thanks! I suspect I didn't look far enough back in time. Seems like just yesterday...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16936296</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 21:36:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Is Norton Net sec 2007 still useing AtGuard?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16935275</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/465492"><b>Jrb2</b></A> :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>quote:</SMALL><HR>There was a thread here discussing a group of individuals that were trying to make an updated version but I searched for it about a week back and couldn't find it.<br><HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>This one:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,15862217">AtGuard Support Forums back online</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16935275</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 19:06:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Is Norton Net sec 2007 still useing AtGuard?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16933228</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/128384"><b>BlitzenZeus</b></A> : AtGuard is too old to resurrect, it would have to be almost completely rewritten as it was designed on the 9x model.  A small group was interested in trying to update Kerio 2.x, but after talking with developers that didn't go anywhere.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16933228</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 13:46:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Is Norton Net sec 2007 still useing AtGuard?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16933142</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1014996"><b>ranschultz</b></A> : To my knowledge, there won't be any further official releases of AtGuard. WRQ has gone in other directions.<br><br>There was a thread here discussing a group of individuals that were trying to make an updated version but I searched for it about a week back and couldn't find it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16933142</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 13:31:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Is Norton Net sec 2007 still useing AtGuard?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16933136</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/128384"><b>BlitzenZeus</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Just Bob <A HREF="/useremail/u/185348"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>Is there a status update on the new version of AtGuard?</DIV>AFAIK there will be no new version of AtGuard, and WRQ washed their hands of it years ago.  Its just Norton now...<br><br>Also anything new would have to be completely rewritten, and I wouldn't accept what Norton has done to it either as I used AtGuard years ago, this is nothing like AtGuard anymore, especially in resource hogging, and how large the program has become.<br><SMALL>--<br><B>My hourly rates:</B><BR>$25 per hour.<BR>$35 per hour if you want to watch.<BR>$45 per hour if you want to help.<BR>$75 per hour if you tried to fix it, and failed.<BR><B>You can change ideas, but its harder to change screwed up beliefs. (Religion)</B></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16933136</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 13:31:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Is Norton Net sec 2007 still useing AtGuard?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16933056</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/185348"><b>Just Bob</b></A> : Is there a status update on the new version of AtGuard?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16933056</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 13:18:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Is Norton Net sec 2007 still useing AtGuard?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16932902</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1014996"><b>ranschultz</b></A> : Although the code has evolved significantly since the original NIS 2000 that was largely derived from the AtGuard technology, the AtGuard technology can still be found in the 2007 version.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16932902</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 12:52:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Is Norton Net sec 2007 still useing AtGuard?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16931847</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/103090"><b>tempnexus</b></A> : I was wondering if the Norton Internet Security 2007 firewall still useing AtGuard technology as it's backbone or has it gone the way of Sygate?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16931847</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 09:43:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
