<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>The respondents, and possible uses of &#x22;extremist&#x22; label in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r16966593</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 04:47:24 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 04:47:24 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>The respondents, and possible uses of &#x22;extremist&#x22; label</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16966593</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1376598"><b>swhx7</b></A> : The approximate list of respondents: &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.elon.edu/predictions/200briefbios.aspx" >www.elon.edu/predictions/200briefbios.aspx</A><br><br>It's an illustrious selection.<br><br>I think the predictions are about right. Most of them are uncontroversial and unsurprising - the one about anti-cyber-luddites is just picked out as the most attention-grabbing.<br><br>What seems to me more likely than real anti-computer "extremism", is certain types of politicians, agencies or interests promoting fear of such a thing as a way to bolster invasions of privacy and other rights. In other words, anti-liberty policies like the NSA surveillance will grow, and those who try to preserve freedom in the digital world may be labeled "terrorists" or "extremists" as a tactic to suppress dissent.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,16966593</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Sep 2006 18:37:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
