amungusPremium
join:2004-11-26
America Reviews:
 ·AT&T DSL Service
| reply to rachelsfx
Re: sure! let's take a big crap on the constitution... Yes, in fact he should. It's far worse than not just "securing" the border, it's going in the totally opposite direction... why do you think they've been so quiet about it...
"if Mexico cared at all about its people they would" ...not be so wishful of (legally or illigally coming to) our land...
PLEASE take the time to read this story and others that are related...
»southwestfarmpress.com/news/0921···orridor/
Just 1 little story about the agricultural impact of the NAFTA superhighway... or, have you not heard about that???
As for your question about what right(s) have been, or would be violated... read this and see if it make any sense to you:
U.S. District Court Judge Anna Diggs Taylor held the program unconstitutional on the ground that it violated the Administrative Procedures Act, the Separation of Powers doctrine, the First and Fourth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), and Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act (Title III)
BTW, what good will this do for our rights??? Name one positive thing that this does to secure them.
Thus, if we trample our own freedoms we've fought and defended, what good does it do? I fail to see how so many people cannot see that line of reasoning and at least debate it in a rational manner.
Of course, I see the point that we should darn well keep tabs on suspected terrorists, and take action where need be to avoid an attack.
I just don't see how giving up our freedoms, liberties, paid for with blood sweat and tears, is the answer. |
