<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Great deal in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r17016926</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 01:46:14 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 01:46:14 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Great deal</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17020104</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1299892"><b>digitalfreak</b></A> : Well, their site currently lists a one year contact as having the exact same price as month to month.  For those who feel safer that they are locked in for a year, they have the option.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17020104</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 13:04:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Great deal</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17018144</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/201506"><b>Skippy25</b></A> : I am not sure I agree with you. Without a contract they will be able to instantly adjust your price to fit their mood. And I would be willing to bet this is the ONLY reason they are getting rid of it. Even when there were contracts you could get their service on a month to month basis. Sure it cost you a little bit more, but thats what you get when you dont want to gaurantee business to them.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17018144</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 01:37:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Great deal</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17017188</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/861603"><b>Mega DETH</b></A> : My AT&T DSL has been VERY Reliable, I would like the Elite 6.0 mbps <br>but I'm just a bit to far away.<br><SMALL>--<br>"Action does not equal Achievement"</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17017188</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 22:24:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Great deal</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17017151</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/917132"><b>swintec</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  BigRooster <A HREF="/useremail/u/1244397"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR><BLOCKQUOTE>Hmm, I don't know a whole lot about AT&Ts reliability, but this should give Verizon a real run for their money(DSL wise, not FiOS).<br><br>It's just a shame it's not available here....</BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>Oh well.  Maybe Time Warner is offering their "Lite" (?) package here already.<br> </DIV>Adelphia always had a lite tier available.  Simply had to call and ask, I believe the speeds were 256/256.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17017151</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 22:16:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Great deal</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17017072</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1244397"><b>BigRooster</b></A> : <BLOCKQUOTE>Hmm, I don't know a whole lot about AT&Ts reliability, but this should give Verizon a real run for their money(DSL wise, not FiOS).<br><br>It's just a shame it's not available here....</BLOCKQUOTE><br><br>Same here.  I like Adelphia's speeds, especially upload, but I'm too busy anymore to make use of it... so I'd rather have $20 1.5mbit DSL, but no availability here either.  It's funny because my uncle, who lives 5 houses down the street, has AT&T DSL and his house is part of the same track as mine.  Also, when I've called AT&T in the past to check availability, the person on the otherside alwys acts surprised that my line doesn't qualify.<br><br>Oh well.  Maybe Time Warner is offering their "Lite" (?) package here already.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17017072</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 22:07:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Great deal</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17016926</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/153280"><b>ajtroglio</b></A> : I've been off contract since June.  However, I see I'm paying Elite prices ($34.99/mo) but I only have the Pro package.  I'm assuming some adjustment is coming my way in the near future.<br><br>The price for the Pro package listed here seems fair.  I've been with SBC/ATT for years now.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17016926</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 21:44:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Great deal</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17016865</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/233222"><b>Frank</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  removed <A HREF="/useremail/u/581232"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>This doesn't matter at all to Verizon. People who have Verizon DSL won't be able to get AT&T DSL, and vice versa.<br> </DIV>I have a verizon line and can get att dsl.<br><br>at least...<br><br>according to this page:<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.usa.att.com/dsl/index.jsp?index=8082" >www.usa.att.com/dsl/index.jsp?index=8082</A><br><br>might be different type of att dsl tho.<br><SMALL>--<br>At first I thought everyone on the highway was drunk but then I realized I was driving in Florida ;)</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17016865</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 21:32:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Great deal</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17016696</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1056211"><b>markrubi</b></A> : Does this mean my contract is null and void now?   If I call and re-rate?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17016696</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 21:03:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Great deal</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17016394</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/957524"><b>jgkolt</b></A> : I second that<br><br>and also it is good that the yearly contracts are gone.  I like my cox dsl but the contracts kept me away(well and their slow speed but that is besides the issue)<br><SMALL>--<br>www.LakeSemaJ.com</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17016394</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 20:24:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Great deal</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17016279</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/581232"><b>removed</b></A> : This doesn't matter at all to Verizon. People who have Verizon DSL won't be able to get AT&T DSL, and vice versa.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17016279</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 20:08:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Great deal</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17016261</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1376775"><b>Fox McCloud</b></A> : Hmm, I don't know a whole lot about AT&Ts reliability, but this should give Verizon a real run for their money(DSL wise, not FiOS).<br><br>It's just a shame it's not available here....]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17016261</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 20:03:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
