<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: cow in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r17032978</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 18:06:06 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 18:06:06 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: cow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17034958</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/262724"><b>powerhog</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  TKJunkMail <A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>More competition is going forward, not backwards. </DIV>Name the competing services of this product and the provider of those services.<br><br>On a side note, I'd really like to have a law forcing anyone that claims satellite is "broadband" to spend two years using it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17034958</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 20:05:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: cow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17033574</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1054326"><b>wifi4milez</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  morbo <A HREF="/useremail/u/568336"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>for those areas where this is the ONLY option, then yes, this is moving forward. otherwise there are still only 2 options, right? dsl or wimax through bs or cable. not to mention that bs is not going to compete seriously against itself, as you can see by the 384 speed and 29.99 price tag.<br> </DIV>Other areas that will begin to see Wimax will have much higher speeds (assuming they already have DSL or cable). Areas that only have dial up or satellite internet will see these type of speeds at first. The way the operators are looking at it is that people will be glad to have <B>any</B> kind of broadband (other than sat) so even 384k is welcome. The other thing is that they can offer 384k, keep customers happy, <B>AND</B> make some decent $$. This is the real driving factor for BS in this case. <br><SMALL>--<br><B>&#1103; &#1083;&#1102;&#1073;&#1083;&#1102; &#1084;&#1077;&#1076;&#1074;&#1077;&#1076;&#1077;&#1081;!</B></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17033574</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:51:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: cow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17033535</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/460388"><b>Rob</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  morbo <A HREF="/useremail/u/568336"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>for those areas where this is the ONLY option, then yes, this is moving forward. otherwise there are still only 2 options, right? dsl or wimax through bs or cable. not to mention that bs is not going to compete seriously against itself, as you can see by the 384 speed and 29.99 price tag.<br> </DIV>Regardless on how you look at it, an additional broadband option is moving FORWARD. The fact now that some areas may have now 4 different options for broadband (cable, dsl, wimax, sat) is moving forward. <br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://www.yourip.us"> YourIP.US </A> - Quickly Locate Your IP!</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17033535</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:44:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: cow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17033502</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/218971"><b>woody7</b></A> : Because us broadband is an oxy moron ;) ;) ;)<br><SMALL>--<br>BlooMe</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17033502</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:38:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: cow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17033455</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/568336"><b>morbo</b></A> : for those areas where this is the ONLY option, then yes, this is moving forward. otherwise there are still only 2 options, right? dsl or wimax through bs or cable. not to mention that bs is not going to compete seriously against itself, as you can see by the 384 speed and 29.99 price tag.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17033455</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 15:29:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: cow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17033105</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>TKJunkMail</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  morbo <A HREF="/useremail/u/568336"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>what a cash cow for BS.  plus, we're bringing back 384 service?? why is the U.S. broadband market going backwards instead of forwards?<br> </DIV>More competition is going forward, not backwards.<br><SMALL>--<br>--<BR><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/8n9wl">Join Red Room Forum</A><BR><A HREF="http://tkjunkmail.blogspot.com">BLOG tkjunkmail.blogspot.com</A><BR><A HREF="http://tkjunkmail.googlepages.com">My Web Page</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17033105</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 14:30:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: cow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17032978</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/460388"><b>Rob</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  morbo <A HREF="/useremail/u/568336"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>what a cash cow for BS.  plus, we're bringing back 384 service?? why is the U.S. broadband market going backwards instead of forwards?<br> </DIV>This is Wimax. Therefore we are going forward as they are bringing a 3rd choice of broadband in some areas, and the ONLY choice for broadband in other areas. <br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://www.yourip.us"> YourIP.US </A> - Quickly Locate Your IP!</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17032978</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 14:12:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>cow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17032958</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/568336"><b>morbo</b></A> : what a cash cow for BS.  plus, we're bringing back 384 service?? why is the U.S. broadband market going backwards instead of forwards?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17032958</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 14:09:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
