 mrchrisOut and aroundPremium
join:2002-10-01
North Babylon, NY | BS This is the biggest load of bullshit ever, why should she even deserve one penny of that? What offended her? She needs to grow some cajones and learn you have to deal with these types of people on the internet. |
|
|
|
 CheesePremium
join:2003-10-26
Naples, FL
kudos:1 | said by mrchris:This is the biggest load of bullshit ever, why should she even deserve one penny of that? What offended her? She needs to grow some cajones and learn you have to deal with these types of people on the internet. Bingo..... |
|
 AmeritecTechChange we can believe in, 1922Premium
join:2002-09-06
Houston, TX
kudos:6 | reply to mrchris
said by mrchris:This is the biggest load of bullshit ever, why should she even deserve one penny of that? What offended her? She needs to grow some cajones and learn you have to deal with these types of people on the internet. If someone effects your profitability by posting lies accusing you of crimes, you should be due compensation.
--
"Independent thinkers tend to ALWAYS have someone Not agreeing with them. It's The non-thinkers that ALWAYS come in legions."
-John Callari |
|
| reply to mrchris
Well, if you read the article, you might get it.
The defendant posted false remarks about her on an Net site devoted to her business and defamed her character. The defendant never even showed up for court. |
|
| reply to AmeritecTech
yep, im sure those remarks cost her 11.3 million  |
|
AmeritecTechChange we can believe in, 1922Premium
join:2002-09-06
Houston, TX
kudos:6 | said by Doom3654:yep, im sure those remarks cost her 11.3 million That's what happens when you don't show up to court. The jury hears one side.
--
"Independent thinkers tend to ALWAYS have someone Not agreeing with them. It's The non-thinkers that ALWAYS come in legions."
-John Callari |
|
 RARPSL
join:1999-12-08
Suffern, NY | reply to rachelsfx
said by rachelsfx:Well, if you read the article, you might get it. The defendant posted false remarks about her on an Net site devoted to her business and defamed her character. The defendant never even showed up for court. Also the message says that proper service of the suit never occurred (ie: The notice never occurred since the mail was returned to the plaintiff's lawyer instead of being delivered to the defendant). Thus the defendant had no reason to know when to show up (this was also stated in the article as one of the reasons she did not show up). |
|
AmeritecTechChange we can believe in, 1922Premium
join:2002-09-06
Houston, TX
kudos:6 | Yet she knew the case was coming up. This would have been a good time to be proactive...instead she stopped paying her lawyer. There's always appeals.
--
"Independent thinkers tend to ALWAYS have someone Not agreeing with them. It's The non-thinkers that ALWAYS come in legions."
-John Callari |
|
bmn? ? ?Premium,ExMod 2003-06
join:2001-03-15
hiatus | reply to AmeritecTech
said by AmeritecTech:If someone effects your profitability by posting lies accusing you of crimes, you should be due compensation. Good luck proving that...
--
Ann Coulter doesn't know jack about science...
"Extremes to the right and left of any political dispute are always wrong." —Dwight Eisenhower |
|
| reply to rachelsfx
You mean the defended posted her opinion about the plaintiff on a site based on her experience with her. Last time I checked that was free speech. Just like you can stand outside of a retail store that wronged you and you can blast them and the management all you want, provided of course it is based on true information.
The article did not give much detail as to why this started, but why she was unable to attend was clear (Katrina Victim that was displaced) and there should of been a motion to extend the trail. |
|
