 pogPremium
join:2004-06-03
Kihei, HI
 ·Hawaiian Telcom
| Reading the whole story can be so enlightening! LOL! Some of the finer points:
• the plaintiff sought no specific damages. That number must have come out the jury's collective ass.
• the plaintiff has not decided whether or not to try collecting any of the award.
• the plaintiff "was so vested in being vindicated, she was willing to pay court costs"... "even though she knew the defendant ... has no hope of paying"
• the defendant offered no defense because she was otherwise occupied by Katerina, a flooded house, being temporarily relocated to Texas... court papers were not deliverable during this time.
• because the defendant offered no defense, we don't know how true any of her critical/negative comments about the plaintiff were.
For those that really want more information closer to the source, I suggest visiting the forum in question... for eg:
»wwf.fornits.com/viewtopic.php?t=18594
--
My Site |
