<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Hate to say I told ya so, but.... in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r17080659</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 17:43:48 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 17:43:48 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Hate to say I told ya so, but....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17080786</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : ........... get the vonage commercial music going too]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17080786</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 13:00:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Hate to say I told ya so, but....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17080659</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/379790"><b>phattieg</b></A> : I knew it.  This is going to be such a waste of money to begin with.  The company might as well deploy fiber, as they are already paying out the wazoo for the RT's.  The cost of just going all the way and doing fiber is equal to, if not cheaper, than doing it this way.  Totally impractical.  The end result will not be worth the customers money.  They would be better off servicing the "ineligible" with hybrid satellite/DSL with VoD capabilities.  Not only could they benefit by designing the equipment/settop boxes, but they could also benefit by simply doing a contract with a dish vendor, saving them the cost of deploying more equipment other than their settop boxes.  Oh well, they make a perfect example of the Vonage logo, "people do stupid things".<br><SMALL>--<br>SIPPhone/Gizmo # 17476200648 / PIMPNET Chatline / Ran by Asterisk & Slackware 10.1.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17080659</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 11:30:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
