<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: TCP/IP is not broadcast in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r17081835</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 15:49:57 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 15:49:57 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: TCP/IP is not broadcast</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17081835</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1083923"><b>rachelsfx</b></A> : If at&t says it'll work, dammit it'll work.<br><br>at&t has a strategy, err, ideas, err, stupid ideas. They have the technology, err, possible techno-, err, YES! The NSA on their side.<br><br>at&t<br>Yo r Wo ld. D li e d.<br><br>Bloody compression!<br><br>-Rach]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17081835</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:07:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>TCP/IP is not broadcast</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17079930</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/401000"><b>jjoshua</b></A> : It seems silly to me that these folks are trying to replicate a broadcast paradigm using point to point.<br><br>Hasn't the wheel already been invented here?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17079930</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 09:15:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
