<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Promises... promises in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r17111830</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 21:19:03 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 21:19:03 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Promises... promises</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17111830</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/769628"><b>aztecnology</b></A> : I work in downtown Riverside, the existing WiFi is horrible. I hope with the new service that I can sit from my desk and surf the net from my laptop...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17111830</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:43:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Promises... promises</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17111708</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/256196"><b>shortckt</b></A> : We'll see how this works when it's finally online next year. Coverage may be spotty in some areas due to terrain. I hope the city's IT isn't as paranoid as Culver City, that city wifi is so locked down it only allows http and pop3, and even then it's proxied.<br><br>Why don't they install some kind of broadband in the surrounding suburbs instead of the middle of the city where dsl and cable broadband is already available.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17111708</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 15:24:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
