| If it can't survive w/o breaking law - good riddance But it will survive, because Google will sign deals compensating music and movie and TV companies to keep their products online. And there will still be millions of people who will want to upload videos of their last cookout or birthday party
--
--
Join Red Room Forum
BLOG tkjunkmail.blogspot.com
My Web Page |
|
|
|
 MattAll noise, no signal.Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
kudos:12 | said by fAcEtIOUs:But it will survive, because Google will sign deals compensating music and movie and TV companies to keep their products online. And there will still be millions of people who will want to upload videos of their last cookout or birthday party Yes, but will other people watch them? Probably not.
Less eyes means less advertising revenue. |
|
| reply to fAcEtIOUs
I read a post somewhere (probably on Slashdot) hypothesising that Google might make deals with the content owners to upload clips legally for promotional purposes with an option to buy. YouTube and Google already have great name recognition. Imagine if you could see a music video on YouTube (compressed for the web, of course) and then click on a link to buy the DVD of the video, or the CD of the album. Or, imagine being able to see a small scene of a movie on YouTube and then having a link to click for the movie.
Perhaps the music industry could even legitimize the fan made music videos that exist on YouTube by getting Google to put up "Buy This Song" links to Amazon, iTunes, Napster, wherever. This way, fans could still be creative with the music and the recording industry would get some money flow from it. The music industry could think of it as free promotion of the songs instead of thinking of it as piracy. |
|
fiberguyMy views are my own.Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3 | reply to fAcEtIOUs
You know...? Does it matter? Two boys make a site, site becomes popular, site is sold, two boys make a billion - site is killed for what it was (like so many sites are) boys are still rich.
I wonder if the founders, at this point, care. 
--
"Wipe out the national deficit over night... Tax the stupid!" - about 50 gMail invites available. PM if you'd like one. |
|
Ahrenl
join:2004-10-26
North Andover, MA | reply to Jason Levine
I believe google plans on using an ad revenue share. So x% of whatever add revenue generated during copyrighted material display go's to so-in-so contractee. In this way it remains profitable for google, and provides additional profit to copyright holders. |
|
| Even that method might assuage some copyright holders. Of course, there will always be copyright holders who foam at the mouth whenever they see anything resembling their work online.
And there will be copyright owners who just don't care for the most part. Like Weird Al. After AOL balked at the "World Premiere" for his White & Nerdy video due to it being leaked on YouTube, he simply linked to the YouTube version from his site. The consequence was, tons of people (me for one) loved seeing the video and rushed out to buy his CD. (Ok, I haven't bought the CD yet, but it is on my "must buy" list and that's tough for a CD to get on. Few new CDs make it.) |
|
 dvd536as Mr. Pink as they comePremium
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ
kudos:4 | reply to Ahrenl
said by Ahrenl:I believe google plans on using an ad revenue share. So x% of whatever add revenue generated during copyrighted material display go's to so-in-so contractee. In this way it remains profitable for google, and provides additional profit to copyright holders. but if you take everything down that people go there for, ad revenue wont be there and youtube will just go away like all these other sites that were good until money came along and ruined them.
--
You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth |
|
Ahrenl
join:2004-10-26
North Andover, MA | They wouldn't have to take anything down if they are PAYING the copyright holder... |
|
