| reply to amungus
Re: smear said by amungus:willing to smear anything it sounds like. how can one honestly be anti neutral? Both sides are doing a nice job of smearing the other here. And both sides keep mixing up net neutrality with how many providers are available to the last mile. So far, there are no real net neutrality problems. Both are fighting over what MAY BE a problem in the future.
I think we should wait and see if there is going to be a problem based on abuse of net neutrality before we legislate and regulate it to death.
And Lessig's main gripe about the US falling behind(which I don't agree with) has nothing to do with net neutrality. It has more to do with taxpayer supported subsidization of the telecom industry in some countries.
--
--
Join Red Room Forum
BLOG tkjunkmail.blogspot.com
My Web Page |
|
|
|
 BuriedCaesarIt's Not Polite To Stare.
join:2004-03-27
Richardson, TX | said by fAcEtIOUs:I think we should wait and see if there is going to be a problem based on abuse of net neutrality before we legislate and regulate it to death. By the time any abuse is observed / discovered / reported / exists then it will most likely be too late for anyone to do anything about it. That's what many on the one side of this debate are hoping - and they're scrambling like mad to stay ahead of the legislation game so they can be "grandfathered" or exempted or overlooked when the time comes.
It may already be too late.
--
That was preposterous! Utter Nonsense! Totally unsupportable drivel! You can't be serious!....Um, what did you say? |
|
 MaxoYour tax dollars at work.Premium,VIP
join:2002-11-04
Tallahassee, FL | reply to fAcEtIOUs
said by fAcEtIOUs:And both sides keep mixing up net neutrality with how many providers are available to the last mile. Yeah, that keeps frustrating me. I'm curious as to how many out there debating the issue even understand it. |
|
