Must be on LAN in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r17189699 en Wed, 02 Dec 2009 12:04:10 EDT Wed, 02 Dec 2009 12:04:10 EDT Re: Must be on LAN http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17191426 Maxo : I use ICS. As soon as I read that part I thought, "Oh, then there's nothing to worry about."]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17191426 Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:13:27 EDT Re: Must be on LAN http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17190366 JoeOnSunset : It's irritating that that fact is included only at the very bottom of the article. It's an inside attack, but everyone who reads the headline will assume it's an outside attack. Ugh.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17190366 Tue, 31 Oct 2006 12:11:55 EDT Re: Don't use ICS with wireless. Don't use ICS anyway. (was: Re: http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17189868 Gogo1 : Exactly my setup, minus the inadequate security.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17189868 Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:39:39 EDT Don't use ICS with wireless. Don't use ICS anyway. (was: Re: http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17189734 swhx7 :
Theoretically it could work from nearby if you had a wireless AP going and inadequate security on it, plus ICS. This would be rather odd and seemingly unlikely tho.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17189734 Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:09:15 EDT Must be on LAN http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17189699 proefain :
the attacker would have to be within the LAN in order to make the attack work
Unless I'm reading it wrong the attacker must be on the inside of the ICSed network.

While a agree M$ should not have code that allows this how many people is this going to effect?]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17189699 Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:01:57 EDT