site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
138
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

Test99
Premium
join:2003-04-24
San Jose, CA
kudos:1

People Who Live In Glass Houses

I'm an enthusiastic reader of both BBR and Reason Online. I get lots of valuable information from both sites.

I disagree with the Reason panel's recommendation to ban municipal broadband services.

But when it comes to objective reporting, and, over time, presenting diverse points of view, Reason does make a serious effort. BBR makes no attempt that I can detect to present points of view other than their own. I have no problem with that. It's an interesting point of view.

But BBR questioning Reason's objectivity? Yeah... Right...
--
50775@fwd.pulver.com


Minister

join:2002-01-02
Fleeting

It seems to me the concern isn't so much about objectivity. Subjectivity is fine if you're clearly a "Libertarian" or "consumer advocacy" site. The concern is these groups continually pretending that the agenda is increased broadband deployment or "real competition", when the goal is the idealistic quest for a powerless government, in order to achieve maximum revenue. It is greed dressed up as policy and consumer advocacy. There is a real problem with the use of sophisticated corporate propaganda to control the entire dialog over the direction of telecom policy. I think these are legitimate issues worth discussing.


Monday, 28-May 02:25:49 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics