site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


fAcEtIOUs
Premium
join:2002-03-03
kudos:4

reply to Ahrenl

Re: So find them and swat them again

Said by: Ahrenl See Profile
You're discussing copyright law, which, by the way, isn't in the bible. So you should have no problem with copyright infringement.
quote:
Neither are airplanes or cars. Is it alright to steal them?
Many developing countries have a problem with copyright laws specifically because they will never get a chance to own the vast number of patents that new patents will be based on.
quote:
Patents and copyrights are 2 entirely different things.
I still believe that if you are not harming the livelihood of the copyright holder (as the law actually states) you shouldn't be liable for civil damages.
quote:
But you are denying the copyright holder income. You may not care, but I'm sure the copyright holder does.
--
--
My BLOG
My Web Page

Cyron

join:2002-09-24
Charlotte, NC

said by fAcEtIOUs:

HR>But you are denying the copyright holder income. You may not care, but I'm sure the copyright holder does.
A person is only denying the copyright holder income, if they would have purchased the work had a free copy not
been available. Since this can't be proved either way, you cannot claim definitivey that there is lost income.

Monday, 28-May 02:32:34 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics