<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Deborah Tate in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r17238179</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 19:57:02 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 19:57:02 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Deborah Tate</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17250148</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1070995"><b>quetwo</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  lvas <A HREF="/useremail/u/392445"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>Encourage real competition &#150; ha there that is again.  Like choosing between wireless, cable and telco are not real choices.  yes there is SAT download too and  Maybe someday BPL and floating blimps will work, but in the mean time the big 3 are the only game in town.  So how is there NOT competition now between those 3 methods?  I just don&#146;t get it.  Or do you really mean you want the holy grail of 100mg down and 3mg up and until you get that for $40 dollars a month there is no real competition.  Never mind who pays for building it &#150; you just want it now &#150; is that what everybody means by real broadband competition?<br> </DIV>How about us that can't get all three in our area.  My area has (some) DSL, and some areas served by Comcast.  My home (which is pretty much in the middle of the city), can get a max of 300/300 DSL (thank you Bell for not upgrading our infrastructure since 1950), or well, nothing.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17250148</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 07:39:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Deborah Tate</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17240735</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/392445"><b>lvas</b></A> : Encourage real competition &#150; ha there that is again.  Like choosing between wireless, cable and telco are not real choices.  yes there is SAT download too and  Maybe someday BPL and floating blimps will work, but in the mean time the big 3 are the only game in town.  So how is there NOT competition now between those 3 methods?  I just don&#146;t get it.  Or do you really mean you want the holy grail of 100mg down and 3mg up and until you get that for $40 dollars a month there is no real competition.  Never mind who pays for building it &#150; you just want it now &#150; is that what everybody means by real broadband competition?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17240735</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 17:07:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Deborah Tate</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17239761</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : He's the token.  There is little he can do by himself except issue these diatribes against the policies currently in force.  It is easy to point out the obvious when you don't have to be the one who picks up the pieces (or the proverbial baby).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17239761</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 14:33:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Deborah Tate</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17238928</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/222537"><b>AtlGuy</b></A> : Well I *was* eating lunch until I saw that hideous pic.  *pushes food away*  I'm suddenly not so hungry.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17238928</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 12:20:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Deborah Tate</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17238473</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/489959"><b>nasadude</b></A> : Deborah Tate is a republican. Republicans believe in big business, not what's best for consumers and America.<br><br>As long as there is a Republican majority at the FCC, nothing will be done to encourage real competition and the U.S. will fall further behind the rest of the world. Their methodologies will not change and they will continue to report misleading statistics about the state of broadband in the U.S.<br><br>There is some hope with the new FCC commissioner, as he lobbyed for the CLECs before being appointed, but until he actually does something we won't know.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17238473</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 10:49:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Deborah Tate</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17238389</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1147610"><b>cableties</b></A> : You want to share a pipe with her?  ;)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17238389</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 10:34:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Deborah Tate</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17238384</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/715380"><b>Maxo</b></A> : <IMG SRC="http://www.fcc.gov/commissioners/tate/dtt.jpg"><br>No thanks. ;)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17238384</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 10:32:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Deborah Tate</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17238345</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/873267"><b>bassnguitar</b></A> : I want what she is smoking.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17238345</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 10:26:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Deborah Tate</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17238338</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/458621"><b>gomer1701ems</b></A> : A prime example of why stupid people should not have children.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17238338</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 10:23:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Deborah Tate</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17238237</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/219915"><b>tquade</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  quetwo <A HREF="/useremail/u/1070995"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR> ... she is very happy with the state of broadband deployment, .... </DIV>The princess has no cloths.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17238237</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 10:03:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Deborah Tate</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17238179</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1070995"><b>quetwo</b></A> : We had the pleasure of having FCC Commissioner Deborah Taylor Tate on the campus of Michigan State University last week, to give a speech on the current state of their policies.  Apparently, she is very happy with the state of broadband deployment, and according to her, BPL will be the way to go for future developments.<br><br>Unfortunately, she said that "with 98% of the country having access to broadband" we are in a very good state of affairs.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17238179</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 09:48:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
