site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
139
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

duckie73

join:2006-11-08
Santa Ana, CA

my 3.5 cents

correct me if i'm wrong, but wasn't it our president that stated his goal to work for universal broadband (broadband for every american household) by 2007, and not the FCC?

from what i'm seeing, the so-called "big/corp business minded" republicans that currently hold the majority in the FCC, seem to have been doing a considerable amount to keep the big names in data service providers from gaining too strong of a hold and monopolizing that market, at the same time, trying to keep up with the goal of "universal broadband"

doesnt hurt to actually read up on what has been accomplished, why our statistics compare that way to other countries, rather than taking an excerpt from an editorial in a newspaper as fact

i find it disturbing that Michael Copps is trying to use that medium as if to say "the american people will be gullible enough to believe that since a reputable author has written an editorial, it must be fact"

some of the facts, but only the parts that support the stance he wants the "gullible" people to support

blah blah blah...ok ok...i think i'm just like putting in way more than my 2 cents....

inflation, so we get 3.5 cents?


KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
Reviews:
·AT&T DSL Service

said by duckie73:

from what i'm seeing, the so-called "big/corp business minded" republicans that currently hold the majority in the FCC, seem to have been doing a considerable amount to keep the big names in data service providers from gaining too strong of a hold and monopolizing that market, at the same time, trying to keep up with the goal of "universal broadband"
LOL!! "Keep the big names from gaining too strong a hold"? How? You mean by APPROVING every Cable and Telco merger possible, while BLOCKING the merger of some of their smaller competitors who were trying to expand their bandwidth and licenses holdings to offer a nationwide broadband alternative? (I'm talking Echostar + DirectTV here, something that BOTH the Cable companies and the Bells DID NOT want, and so SURPRISE it's the only thing the FCC comes out against)...

Encourage universal broadband how? Via one Telecom monopoly, if that monopoly feels like it?

From what I'm seeing it seems like what you're seeing is exactly BACKWARDS from what's been going on.
--
"Regulatory capitalism is when companies invest in lawyers, lobbyists, and politicians, instead of plant, people, and customer service." - former FCC Chairman William Kennard (A real FCC Chairman, unlike the current Corporate Spokesperson in the job!)


jap
Premium
join:2003-08-10
038xx

reply to duckie73

said by duckie73:

... from what i'm seeing, ...
Therein lies the operative?

Monday, 28-May 06:19:40 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics