Re: Why?

Author	All Replies
Karl Bode News Guy join:2000-03-02 kudos:30 Host: Road Runner PC gaming GAMES PC gaming Tech 2 edits	reply to fAcEtIOUs Re: Why? Well then you're changing your position from the last fifty times you've argued in our comment section that users should be billed by the byte. »Bring on the "charge by byte" model »Per Byte model will happen if net neutrality laws passed »Sounds like LR editor advocating per byte bb »ISP's will switch to byte caps if they can't shape torrents »The case for usage based billing There's about sixty more of these from you over the last month. I keep wondering: do you push this simply because you think it's really a good idea, or for some other reason?
	to forum · permalink · 2006-11-09 14:26:11 ·
fAcEtIOUs Premium join:2002-03-03 kudos:4 1 edit	said by Karl Bode: Well then you're changing your position from the last fifty times you've argued in our comment section that users should be billed by the byte. You can go back and check if you want, but most posts will show pay per byte over a base included tier. »Sounds like LR editor advocating per byte bb As for me I have no problem with tiers based on bandwidth consumed instead of speeds. »ISP's will switch to byte caps if they can't shape torrents caps on traffic(uploads especially for cable companies). And onerous fees for going over the caps. »The case for usage based billing Nothing in there precludes per byte after cap. Just general usage billing. -- -- My BLOG My Web Page
fAcEtIOUs Premium join:2002-03-03 kudos:4 1 edit	to forum · permalink · 2006-11-09 14:30:57 ·
Karl Bode News Guy join:2000-03-02 kudos:30	I did, actually. And only the last two posts you've made advocate per-byte billing over a tier limit. You apparently forged this conclusion after people repeatedly told you general per-byte billion would not work, TKJunkmail.
Karl Bode News Guy join:2000-03-02 kudos:30	to forum · permalink · 2006-11-09 14:34:37 ·

Is Xbox 360 Video a Landmark Shift? > Why?