 | [Speed] Anyone having problems? I'm in suburbs of Chicago; Park Ridge. Here's my speed test results.


Tweak test results »/tweakr/block:···a=normal
I'm supposed to be getting 6000/384 (well according to my modem, 6600/384)
The interesting thing is that my pings are ROCK solid. Between 20s and 40s.
Anyone else having issues? |
|
 grazed join:2006-10-15 Havertown, PA | use a test server from your area. |
|
 | reply to Warrior1986 Warrior, I'm in Park Ridge, also.
FWIW, I have the lower tier 4000/384 service and I'm doing fine. I just ran speed tests like yours:

 |
|
 dadkinsCan you do Blu?Premium,MVM join:2003-09-26 Hercules, CA kudos:18 | reply to Warrior1986 What does this test say?
»miranda.ctd.anl.gov:7123/ |
|
 | reply to Warrior1986 Here are the results of that website Dadkins.
This was in the main window.
click START to re-test Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 363.58Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 3.82Mb/s Your PC is connected to a Cable/DSL modem
This was under statistics.
WEB100 Enabled Statistics: Checking for Middleboxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 363.58Kb/s running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 3.82Mb/s
------ Client System Details ------ OS data: Name = Windows XP, Architecture = x86, Version = 5.1 Java data: Vendor = Sun Microsystems Inc., Version = 1.5.0_09
------ Web100 Detailed Analysis ------ Cable modem/DSL/T1 link found. Link set to Full Duplex mode No network congestion discovered. Good network cable(s) found Normal duplex operation found.
Web100 reports the Round trip time = 114.64 msec; the Packet size = 1460 Bytes; and There were 1 packets retransmitted, 42 duplicate acks received, and 43 SACK blocks received The connection stalled 1 times due to packet loss The connection was idle 0.34 seconds (3.40%) of the time This connection is receiver limited 85.46% of the time. This connection is network limited 14.51% of the time.
Web100 reports TCP negotiated the optional Performance Settings to: RFC 2018 Selective Acknowledgment: ON RFC 896 Nagle Algorithm: ON RFC 3168 Explicit Congestion Notification: OFF RFC 1323 Time Stamping: OFF RFC 1323 Window Scaling: OFF Packet size is preserved End-to-End Server IP addresses are preserved End-to-End Information: Network Address Translation (NAT) box is modifying the Client's IP address
Finally, this was under More Details.
WEB100 Kernel Variables: Client: localhost/127.0.0.1 AckPktsIn: 1743 AckPktsOut: 0 BytesRetrans: 1460 CongAvoid: 0 CongestionOverCount: 0 CongestionSignals: 1 CountRTT: 1700 CurCwnd: 17520 CurMSS: 1460 CurRTO: 340 CurRwinRcvd: 65535 CurRwinSent: 5840 CurSsthresh: 32120 DSACKDups: 43 DataBytesIn: 0 DataBytesOut: 4877860 DataPktsIn: 0 DataPktsOut: 3341 DupAcksIn: 42 ECNEnabled: 0 FastRetran: 0 MaxCwnd: 65700 MaxMSS: 1460 MaxRTO: 350 MaxRTT: 220 MaxRwinRcvd: 65535 MaxRwinSent: 5840 MaxSsthresh: 32120 MinMSS: 1460 MinRTO: 320 MinRTT: 100 MinRwinRcvd: 65535 MinRwinSent: 5840 NagleEnabled: 1 OtherReductions: 0 PktsIn: 1743 PktsOut: 3341 PktsRetrans: 1 X_Rcvbuf: 107520 RcvWinScale: 2147483647 SACKEnabled: 3 SACKsRcvd: 43 SendStall: 0 SlowStart: 54 SampleRTT: 110 SmoothedRTT: 120 X_Sndbuf: 107520 SndWinScale: 2147483647 SndLimTimeRwin: 8618699 SndLimTimeCwnd: 1462945 SndLimTimeSender: 3264 SndLimTransRwin: 1 SndLimTransCwnd: 2 SndLimTransSender: 1 SndLimBytesRwin: 4647180 SndLimBytesCwnd: 230680 SndLimBytesSender: 0 SubsequentTimeouts: 0 SumRTT: 194880 Timeouts: 1 TimestampsEnabled: 0 WinScaleRcvd: 2147483647 WinScaleSent: 2147483647 DupAcksOut: 0 StartTimeUsec: 436490 Duration: 10086416 c2sData: 2 c2sAck: 2 s2cData: 3 s2cAck: 3 half_duplex: 0 link: 100 congestion: 0 bad_cable: 0 mismatch: 0 spd: 0.00 bw: 5.62 loss: 0.000299312 avgrtt: 114.64 waitsec: 0.34 timesec: 10.00 order: 0.0241 rwintime: 0.8546 sendtime: 0.0003 cwndtime: 0.1451 rwin: 0.5000 swin: 0.8203 cwin: 0.5013 rttsec: 0.114635 Sndbuf: 107520 aspd: 0.00000
Checking for mismatch on uplink (speed > 50 [0>50], (xmitspeed .9) [0.85>.9], (loss .15) [2.99>.15], (cwndtime > .6) [0.14>.6], (loss 0) [32120>0] Checking for 10 Mbps link (speed 3.0) [0>3.0] (xmitspeed 0) [3.0>0] Checking for Wireless link (sendtime = 0) [3.0E=0], (speed 50 [5.62>50], (Rwintime > 90) [0.85>.90] (RwinTrans/CwndTrans = 1) [1/2=1], (mylink > 0) [3.0>0] Checking for DSL/Cable Modem link (speed 0) [3.0>0] Checking for half-duplex condition (rwintime > .95) [0.85>.95], (RwinTrans/sec > 30) [0.1>30], (SenderTrans/sec > 30) [0.1>30], OR (mylink .02) [0.14>.02], (mismatch = 0) [0=0] (MaxSsthresh > 0) [32120>0]
estimate = 5.62 based on packet size = 11Kbits, RTT = 114.64msec, and loss = 2.99312E-4 The theoretical network limit is 5.62 Mbps The NDT server has a 105.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 7.15 Mbps Your PC/Workstation has a 63.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 4.36 Mbps The network based flow control limits the throughput to 4.37 Mbps
Client Data reports link is 'T1', Client Acks report link is 'T1' Server Data reports link is 'Ethernet', Server Acks report link is 'Ethernet'
I'm not sure what all that means, but the section that caught my eye was the following.
The theoretical network limit is 5.62 Mbps The NDT server has a 105.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 7.15 Mbps Your PC/Workstation has a 63.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 4.36 Mbps The network based flow control limits the throughput to 4.37 Mbps
So what do I do? Looks like it's something on my end I assume? |
|
 | ha warrior...enjoying your comcast while home? i know i am...25 mbps down, 720 up and rock solid pings..ill take it over insight |
|
|
|
 | reply to Warrior1986 LOL.
Actually, I'm not sure. I guess I technically pick here for gaming because all my pings are so low here compared to back at school.
But for downloading or browsing, definitely pick school. For some reason, I've got some issues here according to the test I ran above. |
|
 | reply to Warrior1986 Oh, also my connection was down around 6pm or so according to my line monitor. Here's what the modem has to say.
2006-11-17 18:18:10 critical SYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Loss of Sync 2006-11-17 18:18:10 information Sync recovery loop is locked 2006-11-17 18:18:06 critical SYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Loss of Sync 2006-11-17 18:18:06 critical SYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Failed to acquire FEC framing 2006-11-17 18:17:58 warning Cable Lost FEC lock 2006-11-17 18:17:11 critical SYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Failed to acquire FEC framing 2006-11-17 18:17:11 warning Cable Lost FEC lock 2006-11-17 18:17:04 critical SYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Failed to acquire FEC framing 2006-11-17 18:17:04 warning Cable Lost FEC lock 2006-11-17 18:15:48 notice CM RF interface LinkUp 2006-11-17 18:15:48 information Authorized 2006-11-17 18:15:47 notice Cable Modem Status set to Registration Complete 2006-11-17 18:15:47 information Received REG-RSP from CMTS 2006-11-17 18:15:47 information Sending Registration Request 2006-11-17 18:15:47 information Processing Configuration File 2006-11-17 18:15:40 information DHCP: IP complete 2006-11-17 18:15:39 debug DHCP_coldstart() successfully 2006-11-17 18:15:36 information Beginning ranging process. Initial Power=43.00 dBmV 2006-11-17 18:15:33 information Sync recovery loop is locked 2006-11-17 18:15:29 information Scan Downstream Frequency...
I should add. The modem is quite old. It's a Linksys BEFCMU10. I got it at least 5 years ago. Same with the router. Linksys BEFSR41. But I really hope it's got nothing to do with those things as I never noticed a problem before. |
|
 | reply to Warrior1986 Does anyone know how I can fix this? Or do I have to call Comcast and have someone come out?
Speedtest I just did. Not looking good.
 |
|
 | reply to Warrior1986 Well, I just called and apparently I'm getting some packet loss. I'm not sure how much that should affect the speeds but I guess the tech will look and see why is there packet loss.
Is there anything I can do on my end to address this issue?
The theoretical network limit is 5.62 Mbps The NDT server has a 105.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 7.15 Mbps Your PC/Workstation has a 63.0 KByte buffer which limits the throughput to 4.36 Mbps The network based flow control limits the throughput to 4.37 Mbps
Adjusting that buffer or something? |
|
 | Anyone? |
|
 MortyPremium join:2004-09-18 | trace routes to sites and your signal level readings from the modem (see forum faq's). |
|
 NerdtalkerWorking Hard, Or Hardly Working?Premium,MVM join:2003-02-18 Tucson, AZ | reply to Warrior1986 Essentially, run pingplotter or a traceroute to a site or two, to start generating some logs/documentation of packet loss.
What is your downstream SNR? Check at »192.168.100.1 and post the whole signals page here. -- "Some people never see the light till it shines thru bullet holes." -Bruce Cockburn
I'm testing Gmail's spam filters: Broadbandreports1@gmail.com Spam: 12900+ messages currently using 406 MB. |
|
 | Speed test just run

Info from my modem signal page
Downstream Channel The data shown in the table below provides information about the signal coming from the network to your cable modem. Lock Status Locked Modulation QAM256 Channel ID 69 Symbol rate 5360537 sym/sec Downstream Frequency 711000000 Hz Max Bit Rate 6600000 bps Downstream Power 6.32 dBmV SNR 36 dB
Upstream Channel The data shown in the table below provides information about the signal being transmitted to the network from your cable modem. Lock Status Locked Modulation 16 QAM Channel ID 9 Symbol rate 2560 ksym/sec Upstream Frequency 24000000 Hz Max Bit Rate 384000 bps Upstream Power 40.00 dBmV
|
|
 NerdtalkerWorking Hard, Or Hardly Working?Premium,MVM join:2003-02-18 Tucson, AZ | Well, your signals look acceptable, SNR and downstream are fine, as well as upstream power level.
Have you tested against any other sites? Say »ftp://ftp1.optonline.net/pub/test64 ? |
|
 | reply to Warrior1986 Here are some trace routes
Tracing route to www.l.google.com [72.14.203.104] over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 * * * Request timed out. 2 11 ms 18 ms * 68.86.118.13 3 14 ms * * 10g-9-1-ar02.elmhurst.il.chicago.comcast.net [68 .87.230.45] 4 10 ms 13 ms * 68.87.231.165 5 10 ms 11 ms 12 ms 68.87.231.250 6 10 ms 11 ms 11 ms 12.125.194.9 7 13 ms 12 ms 12 ms tbr1-p011901.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.123.4.226] 8 12 ms 11 ms 12 ms ggr3-ge00.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.123.4.241] 9 32 ms 32 ms 30 ms att-gw.chi.qwest.net [192.205.32.98] 10 32 ms 32 ms 31 ms cer-core-02.inet.qwest.net [205.171.139.61] 11 32 ms 31 ms 31 ms chx-edge-01.inet.qwest.net [205.171.139.166] 12 12 ms 12 ms 12 ms 63.144.64.134 13 11 ms 13 ms 14 ms 66.249.95.253 14 14 ms 14 ms 28 ms 72.14.238.89 15 16 ms 16 ms 15 ms 64.233.175.94 16 13 ms 14 ms 13 ms ro-in-f104.google.com [72.14.203.104]
Trace complete.
Tracing route to www.comcast.net [204.127.195.15] over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 * * * Request timed out. 2 10 ms * * 68.86.118.13 3 * 9 ms * 10g-9-1-ar02.elmhurst.il.chicago.comcast.net [68 .87.230.45] 4 13 ms 9 ms * 68.87.231.165 5 11 ms 10 ms 11 ms 68.87.231.250 6 12 ms 11 ms 11 ms 12.116.7.17 7 55 ms 54 ms 52 ms 12.122.99.10 8 52 ms 52 ms 52 ms tbr1-cl1.sffca.ip.att.net [12.122.10.6] 9 51 ms 53 ms 52 ms gar4-p300.sffca.ip.att.net [12.123.13.174] 10 52 ms 52 ms 52 ms idf22-gsr12-1-pos-7-0.rwc1.attens.net [12.122.25 5.218] 11 62 ms 62 ms 64 ms 63.241.85.98 12 * * * Request timed out. 13 51 ms 51 ms 50 ms www.comcast.net [204.127.195.15]
Trace complete. |
|
 | reply to Nerdtalker
 FTP Site Test |
Here's the test from that site, Nerdtalker. |
|
 | Here is a line quality test I just ran.
»/linequality/nil/2134027 |
|
 | reply to Warrior1986 Anyone? |
|
 Big_DPremium join:2003-06-02 Augusta, GA | Have you tried testing your speeds without your router? |
|