please let it DIE!!! in http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r17349639 en Wed, 02 Dec 2009 16:49:55 EDT Wed, 02 Dec 2009 16:49:55 EDT Re: Bellsouth is terrible http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17354843 Fatal Vector : "BEFORE THE BABY BELLS WERE ALLOWED LONG DISTANCE, OUR PHONE BILLS WERE HIGHER. BEFORE INTERNET TELEPHONE YOU HAD CELL PHONE OR PAY PHONE AS YOUR ONLY OTHER OPTION. NOW WITH THE PHONE COMPANIES OFFERING TV SERVICE AND THE CABLE COMPANIES OFFERING TELEPHONE( AND AS OF LAST WEEK CELL SERVICE TOO) YOUR BILLS FOR THESE SERVICES ARE GOING TO FALL. THE REALITY IS IN THE FUTURE ALL THESE PLAYERS WILL HAVE TO INCREASE SPEEDS AND COVERAGE TO SURVIVE. THERE ARE MORE PLAYERS NOW THAN IN 1984. THAT IS WHY THERE IS CHANGE. THAT IS WHY THERE ARE MERGERS. ITS CALLED NATURAL ORDER--SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST. THE COMPANIES THAT COMBINE THERE RESOURCES HAVE A BETTER CHANCE TO SURVIVE. UNDUE THE MERGERS AND SEE WHATS LEFT AND WHAT KIND OF ADVANCES IN TECHNOLOGY YOU GET"

I have yet to see any of my bills, ESPECIALLY cellular and cable, do anything but go UP. The cable companies are doing nothing but repackaging standard cell plans at the sam prices. I think you need to get a clue.

It's not survival of the fittest, it's a matter of maintaining ones monopoly position. If they were really wanting to compete they would do what was necessary and then start entering each others areas and competing. The fact is that whitacre is trying to put Ma Bell back together and maintain the telco monopoly.

They should be forced to divest theirselves of the ownership of the plant and forced to compete with each other. THAT would lower prices and spur competition.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17354843 Mon, 27 Nov 2006 23:50:13 EDT Re: please let it DIE!!! http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17352266 quatrix : I moved from an AT&T/SBC area to BellSouth. I'd be happy to get AT&T back.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17352266 Mon, 27 Nov 2006 17:31:08 EDT Re: Bellsouth is terrible http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17351756 anon : BEFORE THE BABY BELLS WERE ALLOWED LONG DISTANCE, OUR PHONE BILLS WERE HIGHER. BEFORE INTERNET TELEPHONE YOU HAD CELL PHONE OR PAY PHONE AS YOUR ONLY OTHER OPTION. NOW WITH THE PHONE COMPANIES OFFERING TV SERVICE AND THE CABLE COMPANIES OFFERING TELEPHONE( AND AS OF LAST WEEK CELL SERVICE TOO) YOUR BILLS FOR THESE SERVICES ARE GOING TO FALL. THE REALITY IS IN THE FUTURE ALL THESE PLAYERS WILL HAVE TO INCREASE SPEEDS AND COVERAGE TO SURVIVE. THERE ARE MORE PLAYERS NOW THAN IN 1984. THAT IS WHY THERE IS CHANGE. THAT IS WHY THERE ARE MERGERS. ITS CALLED NATURAL ORDER--SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST. THE COMPANIES THAT COMBINE THERE RESOURCES HAVE A BETTER CHANCE TO SURVIVE. UNDUE THE MERGERS AND SEE WHATS LEFT AND WHAT KIND OF ADVANCES IN TECHNOLOGY YOU GET]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17351756 Mon, 27 Nov 2006 16:26:32 EDT Re: Bellsouth is terrible http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17351484 kingmoon : You are one of the ones who are getting the HUGE upgrade Sad all you people see is there price not the REALITY of it all as in there service is truely best effort just look at there page it shows 3-6meg service not 6meg or 3meg or 1.5meg all ATT's services are this to this ,also there IS a reason ATT was broken up in the first place!!!! Mark my words whoever thinks this will be GOOD, in 5yrs i betcha you will not be sayin that....
--
Athy64 3700@3.0ghz(11x272) MSI Neo2 Platinum (Balistix mod'd)
1024mb pc-3700
Gf6800GT OC
]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17351484 Mon, 27 Nov 2006 15:40:44 EDT Re: Bellsouth is terrible http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17351093 LeeWL :
said by verolom See Profile :

Yes, I agree. BS standard DSL here is only 1.5 Mbps/256 kbps. I fail to see how that is better than SBC.
And the higher levels cost at least $10.00 a month more than similar tiers in the ATT/SBC areas so I am all for it.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17351093 Mon, 27 Nov 2006 14:32:56 EDT Re: Bellsouth is terrible http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17350877 verolom : Yes, I agree. BS standard DSL here is only 1.5 Mbps/256 kbps. I fail to see how that is better than SBC.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17350877 Mon, 27 Nov 2006 13:58:59 EDT Bellsouth is terrible http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17350341 Semi751 : BS better? I guess that depends where you live. Bellsouth in KY is notorious for refusing to upgrade their network to any degree even though they service much of the most populated part of the state. In 2000 when I sold my house there was a year and a half wait for a new phone (basic service) to the new owners because BS refused to upgrade the network.

In 2002 I tried to get ISDN from bellsouth as only 3 blocks in Downtown Frankfort were served with DSL, even ISDN wasn't available. Still today in 2006 I cannot get ISDN let alone DSL. Very few parts of the BS service are in KY are served with DSL while the remote rural areas served by Windstream and other companies have DSL to most homes. Even in extremely rural areas like 10 miles outside of Columbia KY (4,00 population) there is DSL available while in Frankfort and Shelbyville only portions of the town have DSL available. Thank god for cable with companies like Bellsouth.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17350341 Mon, 27 Nov 2006 12:33:03 EDT please let it DIE!!! http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17349639 kingmoon : I honestly hope it does die as bellsouth is a much better company than ATT and having ATT buy bellsouth would mean that most of what bellsouth has planned in the next few years would probably go down the toilet since ATT believes 6meg service is all people realy need/want PLEASE we need to become more like europe where 25meg+ is the norm ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17349639 Mon, 27 Nov 2006 10:07:28 EDT