<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Bye Fiber in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r17404225</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 13:20:29 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 13:20:29 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Bye Fiber</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17406465</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1308792"><b>ninjatutle</b></A> : Yeah but your house could blow up by an installer trying to run new cable. <br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/shownews/79994">Botched Comcast Install Blows Up House</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17406465</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 02:22:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bye Fiber</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17406436</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1397436"><b>matrix3D</b></A> : But wireless will give us all cancer. :o]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17406436</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 02:09:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bye Fiber</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17406245</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/297537"><b>en102</b></A> : Very true...the article doesn't state how much spectrum capacity is required for 280Mbps.  Current CDMA2000 technologies require 1.25MHz channels (1up/1down). <br> <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>quote:</SMALL><HR>UMB would use MIMO and SDMA in order to provide greater capacity and coverage, CDG said<HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br>According to CDG this could mean using 20MHz of spectrum (paired) for 280Mbps.<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.cdg.org/technology/3g_umb.asp" >www.cdg.org/technology/3g_umb.asp</A><br>#  Flexible spectrum allocations<br><br>    * Scalable, non-contiguous and dynamic channel (bandwidth) allocations<br>    * Support for bandwidth allocations up to 20 MHz in 1.25 MHz blocks]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17406245</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 01:04:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bye Fiber</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17404783</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/470470"><b>jmcaruso</b></A> : I think the cited speeds are per cell tower, and it gets divided up by the number of active users.  FTTH will still be plenty useful...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17404783</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 21:20:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bye Fiber</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17404225</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1376775"><b>Fox McCloud</b></A> : Well, Sprint supposedly isn't going the greatest at the moment...<br><br>Perhaps they could slowly start cutting off all their voice customers, and convert all their towers to data only, increase the backhaul to each tower significantly, then institute Revision B nationwide to become the Nation's first and largest nationwide wireless broadband provider. Man, if they did that, it'd make the rural peeps drool all over the place...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17404225</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 20:09:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Bye Fiber</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17403603</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1308792"><b>ninjatutle</b></A> : Yep, I guess thats why AT&T isn't putting all of their eggs into the fibre. <br><br>All of these crybabies on here don't seem to understand wireless is the future. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17403603</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 18:32:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Bye Fiber</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17403518</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/762253"><b>voyager6868</b></A> : Fiber to the home is kind of useless if you can do 280Mbps over the air.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17403518</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 18:20:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
