<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>how about this? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r17407217</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:17:12 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:17:12 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>how about this?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17407217</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/995903"><b>tmc8080</b></A> : A sexier name, how about:<br><br>Knock FTTP and Wimax on their ASS!<br><br>KFWOA?<br><br>Of course comes the obligatory, it's not anywhere near those speeds indoors and no-one knows how practical those speeds are and the cost structure of providing such a service-- if it would knock wimax or fttp out of the park, and give docsis 3.0 a run for it's money. These are forward looking statements, much the same way XDSL equipment was in 1996, 1998, 2002, and so on.. even today they're saying they've solved the last mile crisis in "modulation techniques" only to be Penn & Teller's latest joke called "B/S vdsl!"]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17407217</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 09:01:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
