<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>one thing at a time.. in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r17420947</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:29:29 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:29:29 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>one thing at a time..</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17420947</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/995903"><b>tmc8080</b></A> : first get it deployed... ftth simply isn't as deployed a technology as dsl or cablemodems. the economics of ftth while not a silver bullet for telcos (pricing and availability are still KING), this is something to bring to shareholders, saying the cost to deploy will be NO MORE expensive than rival cablecos docsis 2.0 / 3.0 deployments. time to strike with a new round of ftth deployments, while the weather cooperates (ie no snow on the ground this late into December in the northeast and atlantic states?!)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17420947</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 10:42:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
