Milwaukee Sues AT&T For Ignoring Franchising Process > Att

Att

Maybe the Comcast system in South Holland should just run porn on their VOD service. Their is a potential dispute over the legality of that franchise agreement, but what the hell.

I think, with your line of thinking, that Comcast should pipe out the porn OnDemand to South Holland and then fight it all out in court.

I mean, the system is there and built.. they've been promising it for a long time.

Is this how you want to set presidence? Just "do it" and then fight it in court? Usually what happens, in this "just do it and submit an invoice" kinda actions is that even if it was wrong, the money was spent so they will compromise on something that wasn't done properly. In the end, there are many people who get a half-ass'd deal.

If they want to run their video service (if you call it that) they have to play by the rules.

Also, another example and it was LONGLY termed anarchy.. Maryor Newsome in San Francisco said the supposed gay marriage ban wasn't legal either so he just allowed them and let the courts deal with it. Was that good either?

How many more examples should I bring up?

The laws are there and when there are questions, the proper thing to do is clarify the laws, not simply do first and challenge later.

In this case, I SURE hope that AT&T looses both on law and presidence and it costs them and their supporters a butt load of money.

AT&T is a HORRIBLE company (even though they are really SBC, the horrid name AT&T they attached to has grown roots) and they really need to be betch-slapped back into reality.
--
"Wipe out the national deficit over night... Tax the stupid!" - about 50 gMail invites available. PM if you'd like one.