site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
179
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

GhostDoggy

join:2005-05-11
Duluth, GA

AT&T is above the law.

Especially when they've been able to do what everyone else cannot (bribe successfully).

jober

join:2001-12-13

Hmmm, Maybe they should approach this in another way. You don't see YouTube or any other video service getting the hammer dropped on them. So why doesn't AT&T change the IPTV format to something that wont brake the law.
Instead of a cable box you would have a TVPC Box. The IPTV could be setup like CBS has with Inner Tube.
Never mind!
I'm just going to get flamed for skirting the law or some smart ass is going to give me 2000 reasons why it wont work.
Here's an idea! Lets see how many ways AT&T could do this with out braking the law.


GhostDoggy

join:2005-05-11
Duluth, GA

I think that you have to look at the legal history of Ma Bell. The first law suit against them was more than 100 years ago. They started early and never changed the way they did business. Kind of hard to sympathize.


Monday, 28-May 05:36:28 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics