<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Embarq enabled Fast Path for me! w00t? :) in Embarq</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r17575108</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 08:06:17 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 08:06:17 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Embarq enabled Fast Path for me! w00t? :)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17643746</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1409251"><b>Suiseiseki</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Someguy <A HREF="/useremail/u/1420912"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>so that being the case has this problem been fixed or left untouched<br> </DIV>I do not know the full details on the network group's plans.  We do know that firmware is upgraded when it is appropriate.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17643746</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 01:55:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Embarq enabled Fast Path for me! w00t? :)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17641072</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1208777"><b>JCMSr</b></A> : All I could get out of the Embarq guy was that they had "no way of changing me over".  Only after I pushed a little further into the type of equipment did he mention adtran.  Not sure he really understood everthing since he seemed to be relaying info from the engineer he was working with on the other end.<br><br>As to the quality of the equipment lets just say that it took them over 2 months of working on my connection to get it anywhere close to the 5.0 package.  Download speeds for the first 2 months were around 2400 at best.  After installing either 2 or 3 (sorry I can't remember the exact number) additional T1 lines and correcting a few other problems my service has been rock solid.  Given that I live in a very rural area I am just happy to have DSL service period.  Three years of dealing with a satellite connection was enought for me.<br><br>JCMSr<br><SMALL>--<br>| Embarq HSI 5.0/640| Systemax 3.4 GHz | 2.0 GB DDR400 | WinXP Pro SP2 | 2 Wire 1701HG Gateway and Linksys WRT54G |</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17641072</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2007 17:25:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Embarq enabled Fast Path for me! w00t? :)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17633620</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1420912"><b>Someguy</b></A> : so that being the case has this problem been fixed or left untouched]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17633620</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 09:11:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Embarq enabled Fast Path for me! w00t? :)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17633578</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1409251"><b>Suiseiseki</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Someguy <A HREF="/useremail/u/1420912"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>oh ok they told me the card would drop the connections<br> </DIV>That is/was the case.  Putting a card into mixed modes, interleave and fast path on the same card could cause connections to be dropped.  That is remedied by running the card in only one mode or upgrading the firmware.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17633578</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 08:49:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Embarq enabled Fast Path for me! w00t? :)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17623597</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1420912"><b>Someguy</b></A> : thats what they told me]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17623597</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:57:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Embarq enabled Fast Path for me! w00t? :)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17623241</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/715380"><b>Maxo</b></A> : I may be wrong, but I can't imagine a DSLAM not being able to handle fastpath.  It must be a shitty DSLAM.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17623241</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:59:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Embarq enabled Fast Path for me! w00t? :)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17623232</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1275498"><b>hypnotic</b></A> : adtrans can be set to fast. im on 1 and ive had it on.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17623232</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:58:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Embarq enabled Fast Path for me! w00t? :)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17621027</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1208777"><b>JCMSr</b></A> : Called Embarq yesterday and complained about lag/voice drop issues on my service using VOIP.  Customer rep was very nice, however, I was told that since the equipment at my DSLAM was Ad-Tran there was nothing they could do to help.  Current service is setup on interleave and could not be changed.  Typical pings to first hop are running typically in the 60-80ms range.  Looks like there is not much that can be done to improve my situation.<br><br>JCMSr<br><SMALL>--<br>| Embarq HSI 5.0/640| Systemax 3.4 GHz | 2.0 GB DDR400 | WinXP Pro SP2 | 2 Wire 1701HG Gateway and Linksys WRT54G |</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17621027</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:58:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Embarq enabled Fast Path for me! w00t? :)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17608626</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1420912"><b>Someguy</b></A> : oh ok they told me the card would drop the connections]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17608626</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 13:10:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Embarq enabled Fast Path for me! w00t? :)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17607375</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1409251"><b>Suiseiseki</b></A> : I am not sure about the support for fast path in Ad-Trans, though I know they can be set for it.  All of them I have worked with though have been set for interleave.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17607375</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 09:18:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Embarq enabled Fast Path for me! w00t? :)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17603584</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1420912"><b>Someguy</b></A> : thank you for correcting me<br><br>though am i correct on the Ad-Trans not supporting fastpath at this time, or has that changed?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17603584</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 17:52:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Embarq enabled Fast Path for me! w00t? :)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17603371</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1409251"><b>Suiseiseki</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Someguy <A HREF="/useremail/u/1420912"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>doesn't embarq have 2 types of dslam's which i believe are ad-trans and AFCs</DIV>Embarq uses about nine different DSLAMs for various purposes.<br><br>Purposely, I am fond of Ad-Trans and Stingers because they use telnet.  :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17603371</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 17:20:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Embarq enabled Fast Path for me! w00t? :)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17592725</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1420912"><b>Someguy</b></A> : Please correct me if I am wrong<br><br>right if they put you on fast path the you and the other users on your card will drop like once an hour or something.<br><br>it has something to do with the cards firm ware if you read here. what I gather from it. fast path should work after adsl 2+ is deployed<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,17201555">DHCP, ADSL2+, Fast Path, and 660 Information</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17592725</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 21:39:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Embarq enabled Fast Path for me! w00t? :)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17589539</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/956597"><b>Sly</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Someguy <A HREF="/useremail/u/1420912"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>at least that's what they told me when i called and i happened to be on the ad-tran dslam which doesn't support fast path  :(<br> </DIV>That's it!! Thanks. That is what they told me I was on and that fastpath is not supported. So what does this mean? Does the line use interleave and they can't turn it off or does it do something completely different?<br><SMALL>--<br>"The penalty good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men."<br>- Plato -<br></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17589539</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 11:24:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Embarq enabled Fast Path for me! w00t? :)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17589523</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1420912"><b>Someguy</b></A> : doesn't embarq have 2 types of dslam's which i believe are ad-trans and AFCs<br><br>Please correct me if i am wrong<br>the ad-trans don't support mixed mode when they are placed in mixed mode they cause the card to drop the connections every so often?  :huh:<br><br>the AFCs have no problem with mixed mode but most people on them have fast path as default<br><br>at least that's what they told me when i called and i happened to be on the ad-tran dslam which doesn't support fast path  :(]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17589523</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 11:21:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Embarq enabled Fast Path for me! w00t? :)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17585106</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Embarq will activate past path if you call in, ask for level 2 support, then say you have VOIP and the lag issues are causing voice drop problems. They have been told not to do it for any other reason(s).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17585106</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 16:33:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Embarq enabled Fast Path for me! w00t? :)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17583304</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1376775"><b>Fox McCloud</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Sly <A HREF="/useremail/u/956597"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>I think Gray has far better service than I have out here in Limestone... I'm about 5 miles from my central office.  :o<br> </DIV>wow, consider yourself lucky, I live that distance from the CO, and there's not DSL traveling over any twisted pairs out here....<br><br>Anyway, my friend is getting around 80 ms ping times with Embarq...so I'll tell him about this 'fastpath', perhaps it'll help him out when it comes to online gaming, amongst other things.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17583304</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 12:11:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Embarq enabled Fast Path for me! w00t? :)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17583186</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/956597"><b>Sly</b></A> : Well they toyed around with me some... The first tech I called said he couldn't turn off interleave but that he could reduce the delay. He told me to give it a few minutes and then check to see if it got better. It didn't. I called back and got another tech. I got a run around and he finally said that my line doesn't even use interleave and that it can't be turned off. <br><br>Overall my pings are better than they were a few months ago. At least the line is usable but I have seen no improvement at all to my first hop. It's not as good as I had with Comcast but it is better than nothing.<br><br>I think Gray has far better service than I have out here in Limestone... I'm about 5 miles from my central office.  :o<br><SMALL>--<br>"The penalty good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men."<br>- Plato -<br></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17583186</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 11:52:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Embarq enabled Fast Path for me! w00t? :)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17583091</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/759535"><b>CPUYODA</b></A> : Im in Gray,and a friendly tech here did for me....<br><br>But my first hop is still 40ms....but waaay better than 80.<br><br>I would cancel my account with them if they turned my interleave back on.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17583091</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 11:37:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Embarq enabled Fast Path for me! w00t? :)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17582792</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/956597"><b>Sly</b></A> : I can't get it enabled. I have already been through it with them to get interleave turned off or the interleave delay reduced... I finally got in touch with a tech who claimed that my line does not support interleave anyway and so there is no way to turn it off since it doesn't even use it. He claimed that they were using a "different kind of technology". I don't know if I believe him or not but my first hop is always about 37ms. Dslreports is never faster than 51ms.<br><SMALL>--<br>"The penalty good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men."<br>- Plato -<br></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17582792</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 10:47:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Embarq enabled Fast Path for me! w00t? :)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17582466</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : A for me, it was even better, 47ms to 1st hop, now 11ms]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17582466</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 09:45:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Embarq enabled Fast Path for me! w00t? :)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17582457</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Basically DSL was originally developed to send video over copper so the telco's could compete with cable. It's error checking is interleave which is default. Since DSL is being used for TCP, which has it's own error checking, there is no need for interleave to be on. Hence, fastpath...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17582457</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 09:43:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Embarq enabled Fast Path for me! w00t? :)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17576717</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/715380"><b>Maxo</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  sandavis <A HREF="/useremail/u/1303005"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>What is fast path?<br> </DIV>&raquo;<A HREF="/faq/bellsouth">AT&T Southeast  Forum FAQ</A> &raquo;<A HREF="/faq/2182">What is meant by 'FastPath' and 'Interleaving'?  What is a 'Noise Profile'?</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17576717</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 11:51:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Embarq enabled Fast Path for me! w00t? :)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17576513</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1303005"><b>sandavis</b></A> : What is fast path?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17576513</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 11:08:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Embarq enabled Fast Path for me! w00t? :)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17576346</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1130319"><b>gayle56</b></A> : They enabled it for me too!!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17576346</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 10:31:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Embarq enabled Fast Path for me! w00t? :)</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17575108</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/277859"><b>brianbhsd</b></A> : Just wanted to tell people not to lose hope..I was able to get a very nice Embarq rep to enable fast path on my line..my first hop dropped from 16-17ms to 7ms , and sequential hops seem to be enjoying benefits as well..overall, my yahoo ping has been reduced from 67ms to 46ms..and gains can be found elsewhere as well..<br><br>All is not lost!<br><br>FYI I reside in the downtown Naples area]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17575108</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 01:18:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
