<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: How can they trade mark such a word? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r17620829</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 06:41:51 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 06:41:51 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: How can they trade mark such a word?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17650108</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/318345"><b>elvey</b></A> : I recall that Microsoft lost the case (and appeals) against Lindows (now Linspire) in the USA, but kept suing Lindows in every country in the world, one by one.  They lost in about half a dozen countries in a row, and finally won in one.  <br>Microsoft's not above SLAPP lawsuit abuse. <br><SMALL>--<br>SBC is <A HREF="http://www.spamhaus.org/statistics.lasso">the world's second-largest SpamHaus</A> and leads an <A HREF="http://www.dslreports.com/comment/311/39516">Organized Crime Syndicate</A>. Also see TURN.org or <A HREF="http://UCAN.org">UCAN</A>.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17650108</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 03:35:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: How can they trade mark such a word?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17623573</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/243341"><b>nklb</b></A> : <STRIKE>"Linspire" is the new name that is the end result of the lawsuit; the original name that provoked the suit was "Lindows"</STRIKE><br><br>Edit: Oops, my eyes skipped right over where you said this, sorry]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17623573</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:54:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: How can they trade mark such a word?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17622506</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/265762"><b>Goober</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  cdru <A HREF="/useremail/u/811675"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</SMALL><BR><BR>Even then, it's not 100% clear on the trademarking of Windows.  Back a few years a company called Linspire came out with a Linux distribution that ran some Windows applications called Lindows.  Microsoft sued because the trademarks were sufficiently similar that it could cause confusion to consumers.  While the case was ultimately settled out of court before all appeals were exhausted, it was quite a ways down the path of Microsoft losing the case because Microsoft had used the term "windows" in describing the GUI prior to Windows (the product) from ever being released.  Apple and Xerox had also implemented the idea and used the terminology prior to Microsoft telemarketing it as well.  It would be similar to me trademarking the name Phones and then suing any company that used the derivative of that.<br><br>Trademarks are used to product product name recognition in the market place.  Multiple companies can own the same or similar trademark as long as the use of the trademark is in different areas and would not be commonly confused by the lay person.  My company has a trade mark of "Do it Best" (the hardware store).  Nike has the trade mark "Just Do It".  They are fairly similar, but it's not likely someone would confuse a hardware store and a sports clothing company. <br> </DIV>Microsoft's registration for Windows is very clear.  What was not clear was that Lindows was sufficiently similar to cause confusion.  Microsoft losing the case would have had zero impact on it Windows mark relating to the OS.<br><br>Establishing secondary meaning trumps prior usage as a generic term.  So, I can't agree with your comparison of the trademark Phones.  I think you're missing the point.<br><br>This is a good primer that you can read to learn more about trademarks.  &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.registeringatrademark.com/protectable-marketable-trademark.shtml" >www.registeringatrademark.com/pr&middot;&middot;&middot;rk.shtml</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17622506</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:12:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: How can they trade mark such a word?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17622403</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/168864"><b>sporkme</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Maxo <A HREF="/useremail/u/715380"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>Cisco had secured the patent for the name 10 years ago.<br><A HREF="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/mobile-phones/the-iphone-arrives-via-cisco.asp">Source</A><br> </DIV>Actually a company called InfoGear that Cisco bought had secured the trademark.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17622403</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:57:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: How can they trade mark such a word?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17622395</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/381724"><b>GilbertMark</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Warez_Zealot <A HREF="/useremail/u/1350735"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>That's essentially like trademarking internet phone... or phone with an i in front of it.. Isn't there some law against trademarking common words?<br><br>Cisco should have this trademark reviewed than rejected...  <br> </DIV>iPhone is not a common word you will not find it in a dictionary.<br><SMALL>--<br>Got a V3 or a V3i or an L7?  Want to get the most out of them?  Check out my sites &raquo;<A HREF="http://hacktheV3.com" >hacktheV3.com</A> and &raquo;<A HREF="http://hacktheV3i.com" >hacktheV3i.com</A> and &raquo;<A HREF="http://hacktheL7.com" >hacktheL7.com</A><br></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17622395</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:56:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: How can they trade mark such a word?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17621934</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/811675"><b>cdru</b></A> : Even then, it's not 100% clear on the trademarking of Windows.  Back a few years a company called Linspire came out with a Linux distribution that ran some Windows applications called Lindows.  Microsoft sued because the trademarks were sufficiently similar that it could cause confusion to consumers.  While the case was ultimately settled out of court before all appeals were exhausted, it was quite a ways down the path of Microsoft losing the case because Microsoft had used the term "windows" in describing the GUI prior to Windows (the product) from ever being released.  Apple and Xerox had also implemented the idea and used the terminology prior to Microsoft telemarketing it as well.  It would be similar to me trademarking the name Phones and then suing any company that used the derivative of that.<br><br>Trademarks are used to product product name recognition in the market place.  Multiple companies can own the same or similar trademark as long as the use of the trademark is in different areas and would not be commonly confused by the lay person.  My company has a trade mark of "Do it Best" (the hardware store).  Nike has the trade mark "Just Do It".  They are fairly similar, but it's not likely someone would confuse a hardware store and a sports clothing company. <br><SMALL>--<br>Quis custodiet custodes ipsos?</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17621934</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 12:40:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: How can they trade mark such a word?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17621176</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/265762"><b>Goober</b></A> : Common words can serve as trademarks as well.  You just have to establish a secondary meaning for the word.  It took MS almost a dozen years to do this for their operating system.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17621176</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:22:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: How can they trade mark such a word?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17621173</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/715380"><b>Maxo</b></A> : Thanks for the correction.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17621173</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:22:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: How can they trade mark such a word?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17621160</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/265762"><b>Goober</b></A> : It's just Windows.  It took them almost 12 years before they were given a registration number for the OS.<br><br>-----------------------------------------<br><br>Word Mark WINDOWS <br>Goods and Services IC 009. US 038. G & S: computer programs and manuals sold as a unit; namely, graphical operating environment programs for microcomputers. FIRST USE: 19831018. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 19831018 <br>Mark Drawing Code (1) TYPED DRAWING <br>Design Search Code  <br>Serial Number 74090419 <br>Filing Date August 20, 1990 <br>Current Filing Basis 1A <br>Original Filing Basis 1A <br>Published for Opposition June 21, 1994 <br>Registration Number 1872264 <br>Registration Date January 10, 1995 <br>Owner (REGISTRANT) Microsoft Corporation CORPORATION DELAWARE One Microsoft Way Redmond WASHINGTON 980526399 <br>Assignment Recorded ASSIGNMENT RECORDED <br>Type of Mark TRADEMARK <br>Register PRINCIPAL-2(F) <br>Affidavit Text SECT 8 (6-YR). SECTION 8(10-YR) 20050407. <br>Renewal 1ST RENEWAL 20050407 <br>Live/Dead Indicator LIVE ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17621160</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:20:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: How can they trade mark such a word?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17621124</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/715380"><b>Maxo</b></A> : Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the trademarked term is "Microsoft Windows", not just "Windows"]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17621124</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:12:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: How can they trade mark such a word?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17621123</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/265762"><b>Goober</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Maxo <A HREF="/useremail/u/715380"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR>Cisco had secured the <STRIKE><br>patent</STRIKE> trademark registration for the name 10 years ago.<br><A HREF="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/mobile-phones/the-iphone-arrives-via-cisco.asp">Source</A><br> </DIV>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17621123</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:12:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: How can they trade mark such a word?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17621114</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/265762"><b>Goober</b></A> : It took Microsoft many, many years before Windows gained secondary meaning enough to be registrable.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17621114</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:11:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: How can they trade mark such a word?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17621091</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/793276"><b>brandon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  kamm <A HREF="/useremail/u/315019"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  brandon <A HREF="/useremail/u/793276"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Warez_Zealot <A HREF="/useremail/u/1350735"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>   :</SMALL><br><br>That's essentially like trademarking internet phone... or phone with an i in front of it.. Isn't there some law against trademarking common words?<br></DIV>How the heck is iPhone a common word?  They're not trying to trademark the letter "i" nor the word "phone."  "iPhone" IS a trademark, however.  It's kinda like how the word "American" can't be trademarked, and the word "Idol" can't be trademarked, but you can sure believe the words "American Idol" are trademarked. <br><br>Linksys had a working telephone that has been officially launched into the market, called an iPhone, and had the trademark for the name since 2000.  There is no reason why Apple should have any rights to the trademark unless Cisco grants it to them.  If Apple hasn't been granted the rights to iPhone, then they can't start marketing it as such, which is what they did here.<br> </DIV>I'm curious about your take on the trademarked name of "windows"...<br> </DIV>I would venture to say that if Microsoft were actually selling windows (as in those things with glass in them) then they wouldn't be allowed the trademark.  As it stands with Windows being completely different from the standard use of the word, it is allowed.<br><br>My opinions are often worthless however! :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17621091</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:07:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: How can they trade mark such a word?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17621065</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/715380"><b>Maxo</b></A> : Cisco had secured the patent for the name 10 years ago.<br><A HREF="http://blog.tmcnet.com/blog/tom-keating/mobile-phones/the-iphone-arrives-via-cisco.asp">Source</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17621065</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:03:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: How can they trade mark such a word?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17621037</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/315019"><b>kamm</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  brandon <A HREF="/useremail/u/793276"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Warez_Zealot <A HREF="/useremail/u/1350735"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>   :</SMALL><br><br>That's essentially like trademarking internet phone... or phone with an i in front of it.. Isn't there some law against trademarking common words?<br></DIV>How the heck is iPhone a common word?  They're not trying to trademark the letter "i" nor the word "phone."  "iPhone" IS a trademark, however.  It's kinda like how the word "American" can't be trademarked, and the word "Idol" can't be trademarked, but you can sure believe the words "American Idol" are trademarked. <br><br>Linksys had a working telephone that has been officially launched into the market, called an iPhone, and had the trademark for the name since 2000.  There is no reason why Apple should have any rights to the trademark unless Cisco grants it to them.  If Apple hasn't been granted the rights to iPhone, then they can't start marketing it as such, which is what they did here.<br> </DIV>I'm curious about your take on the trademarked name of "windows"...<br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://nexgenwars.com/images/wii_forum2.jpg"></A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17621037</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:59:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: How can they trade mark such a word?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17620829</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/793276"><b>brandon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Warez_Zealot <A HREF="/useremail/u/1350735"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</SMALL><BR><BR>That's essentially like trademarking internet phone... or phone with an i in front of it.. Isn't there some law against trademarking common words?<br></DIV>How the heck is iPhone a common word?  They're not trying to trademark the letter "i" nor the word "phone."  "iPhone" IS a trademark, however.  It's kinda like how the word "American" can't be trademarked, and the word "Idol" can't be trademarked, but you can sure believe the words "American Idol" are trademarked. <br><br>Linksys had a working telephone that has been officially launched into the market, called an iPhone, and had the trademark for the name since 2000.  There is no reason why Apple should have any rights to the trademark unless Cisco grants it to them.  If Apple hasn't been granted the rights to iPhone, then they can't start marketing it as such, which is what they did here.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17620829</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:20:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>How can they trade mark such a word?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17620779</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1350735"><b>Warez_Zealot</b></A> : That's essentially like trademarking internet phone... or phone with an i in front of it.. Isn't there some law against trademarking common words?<br><br>Cisco should have this trademark reviewed than rejected...  <br><SMALL>--<br>The meek shall inherit the earth but don't forget the poor are the ones who inherit the debt.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17620779</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:07:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
