republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Dems Eye FCC Decisions » Many Changes at the FCC...
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
it doesn't really matter »
« Oh Oh  
AuthorAll Replies

MASantangelo
Premium
join:2004-07-19
Pittstown, NJ

reply to Rob
Re: Many Changes at the FCC...

1) Agreed.
2) 2 at the minimum would be nice, I'll settle for 1 for now.
3) What is the current requirement? I've not heard much on it.
--
Don't Let Them Take Your Rights!


Rob
In Deo speramus, God Bless the USA
Premium
join:2001-08-25
Kendall, FL
·Comcast

said by MASantangelo See Profile :

3) What is the current requirement? I've not heard much on it.
According to the FCC, if 1 person in a zip code qualifies for broadband, then the entire zip code is considered to be broadband ready.
--
YourIP.US - Quickly Locate Your IP!

MASantangelo
Premium
join:2004-07-19
Pittstown, NJ
That's just ridiculous...


Rob
In Deo speramus, God Bless the USA
Premium
join:2001-08-25
Kendall, FL
·Comcast

said by MASantangelo See Profile :

That's just ridiculous...
Yep.
--
YourIP.US - Quickly Locate Your IP!


TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

reply to Rob
said by Rob See Profile :

said by MASantangelo See Profile :

3) What is the current requirement? I've not heard much on it.
According to the FCC, if 1 person in a zip code qualifies for broadband, then the entire zip code is considered to be broadband ready.
I've seen this fact quoted often here in these BBR news items, but I have never seen it on the FCC web site. Does anyone have a link verifying this claim.
--
--
My BLOG
My Web Page

PeterCollins

join:2005-05-23
Geneva, IL

reply to Rob
and watch how quickly, just by raising the bandwidth rate from 200k to 1.5m, how many zip codes suddenly DON'T have access to "broadband."

I think that would be very telling...we may actually start to get a "closer to real" view of where we stand. Granted if only one person in the zip could get 1.5 down, you're still going to see misrepresentation, but it would be a start.

PeterCollins

join:2005-05-23
Geneva, IL
reply to TKJunkMail
»hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/a···93A1.pdf

Page 2


TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

said by PeterCollins See Profile :

»hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/a···93A1.pdf

Page 2
THANKS.

But I believe this statistic quoted in the same report is more relevant than 99% of ZipCodes have broadband stat.

As a nationwide average, we estimate that high-speed DSL connections were available to 78% of the households to whom incumbent LECs could provide local telephone service as of December 31, 2005, and that high-speed cable modem service was available to 93% of the households to whom cable system operators could provide cable TV service.

--
--
My BLOG
My Web Page

ross

join:2000-08-16
·Digizip

"As a nationwide average, we estimate that high-speed DSL connections were available to 78% of the households to whom incumbent LECs could provide local telephone service as of December 31, 2005, and that high-speed cable modem service was available to 93% of the households to whom cable system operators could provide cable TV service."

Sounds like this fairy tale is based on 200kbps "broadband", and if that's all you believe is needed, then, as in your myopically pedantic world, the Telco line is all you need to tow.

VerizonCynic

join:2006-10-25
Lakewood, CA
reply to Rob
Should be ZIP plus 4 for an area. that is like 20 homes

Asmodeus

join:2004-05-26
Spring Valley, CA

reply to PeterCollins
said by PeterCollins See Profile :

and watch how quickly, just by raising the bandwidth rate from 200k to 1.5m, how many zip codes suddenly DON'T have access to "broadband."

I think that would be very telling...we may actually start to get a "closer to real" view of where we stand. Granted if only one person in the zip could get 1.5 down, you're still going to see misrepresentation, but it would be a start.
and then the costs get past down to you... the providers will never foot the bill in either case however broadband is catergorized...

PeterCollins

join:2005-05-23
Geneva, IL
That's not really my point.

Regardless of who pays for it, we shouldn't be calling 200k down "broadband." It pains me to call 1.5 down broadband too, but if we're looking for a minimum it seems like a better place to start.
Forums » Dems Eye FCC Decisionsit doesn't really matter »
« Oh Oh  


Tuesday, 24-Nov 00:49:41 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [83] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [51] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [30] AT&T Offers New Prepaid Wireless plans
· [29] Earthlink Suffers From Major E-mail Outage
· [25] Frontier Increases Modem Rental Fee
· [12] Vivendi In Way Of Comcast's NBC Desires
· [11] Charter Still Fighting With Creditors
· [7] Monday Morning Links
Most people now reading
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Big Bank Alternative to Bank of America? [General Questions]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Bell's Network Management practices page [TekSavvy]
· netTalk tk6000 [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Firearms: Ammo question. [General Questions]
· Gizmo5 has added a Google Voice section in its members area. [VOIP Tech Chat]
· What to use while demonoid is down? [Filesharing Software]
· Using DIR-615 C1/3.01 with Trendnet TEW-652BRP in N Mode [D-Link]