| Not an apple fan boy... but I think the prognostication about this phone being a flop is a little shortsighted. I wouldn't use it because it doesn't fit my needs. However with the amount of people who have razors, chocolates and other IMHO poorly thought-out /working phones, I can't see calling this ones popularity "shaky" because of a few missing features.
What I (and BBR users) like/demand in products and what the general masses buy are often very different... |
|
|
|
| »www.usatoday.com/tech/columnist/···ne_x.htm
"iDon't think so
First of all, to use the iPhone you need to use Apple's iTunes software, and with it Apple's FairPlay (ha!) digital rights management scheme. It means dealing with a product that — despite what Mac fanatics say — is fraught with problems. That's why so many are installing Rockbox instead.
At this point it isn't clear whether anyone but Apple will be allowed to create applications for the iPhone, although it does run OSX. At the start, though, it will only do what Apple allows it to. As with all things Apple, it's their way or the highway, and right now that doesn't include supporting Word or Excel files, so business users may want to look elsewhere." |
|
| Like i said when the iphone was introduced they gonna tech support on that product and fast. |
|
| reply to truocchio
said by truocchio:...I can't see calling this ones popularity "shaky" because of a few missing features. What I (and BBR users) like/demand in products and what the general masses buy are often very different... You may be correct. I think the masses however will avoid this phone due to the $500-600 price tag plus being chained to Cingular for two years; I know that is the reason I am. |
|
 CjaicemanPremium,MVM
join:2004-10-12
Parker, CO
kudos:2
 ·Comcast Business..
| said by truocchio:I think the masses however will avoid this phone due to the $500-600 price tag plus being chained to Cingular for two years; I know that is the reason I am. I'm on Cingular (came over from AT&T) and I have no problems with them. They have great service everywhere I go, have good phones, and have reasonable prices. (NOTE - Your milage will vary). But the $500-$600 price ON TOP OF a contract is just WAY to expensive. My question is, why didn't Apple put UMTS and HSDPA support? Cingular already has a device that WILL support it for less money. I don't mind using the Pocket PC OS as I have been using it for several years. I currently have a PPC-6700 through Sprint that was provided by my company. I'm mainly saying, wait a while, the price might come down, and Apple might unteather from Cingular and go with TMobile as well. Apple said they have NO plans on making the phone in any other technology than GSM (which is a world standard) meaning Sprint, Verizon won't ever get this phone.
--
Hot Jamz 94FM »cjaiceman.is-a-geek.com/hotjamz/hotjamz.pls |
|
 N3OGHYo Soy Col. "Bat" GuanoPremium
join:2003-11-11
Philly burbs
kudos:1 | reply to kyramilan
After owning a supposed "multimedia" phone, I won't buy another one. I have both MP3 and Video capabilities on the phone I have now, and I almost never use it. I never use the MP3 capability, and I rarely use the video.
I do use the mobile internet a lot, and plan on getting a Treo or a blackberry as my next phone.
I'm a self admitted Apple fan, but at $500 I don't see an iPhone in my future.
--
Never ask what sort of a computer a guy drives. If he's a Mac user, he'll tell you. If not, why embarrass him? -Tom Clancy |
|
| reply to truocchio
»www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xXNoB3t8vM |
|
| reply to brooklynman4
What? |
|
| reply to kyramilan
said by kyramilan: At the start, though, it will only do what Apple allows it to. As with all things Apple, it's their way or the highway, and right now that doesn't include supporting Word or Excel files, so business users may want to look elsewhere." Where the $#%@ have you been? Mac OS X has been using Office docs for years. If there is anything to be limited on the iPhone, I would bet it will be cell carriers who will do it. They are notorious for that.
This whole article is hilarious. How can they possibly speculate on a handheld that nobody (much less the hacking community) has ever even seen up close? And while OS X isn't perfect, it does enjoy a reputation for being one of the most secure and stable OS available! |
|
 TransmasterDon't Blame Me I Voted For Bill and Opus
join:2001-06-20
Cheyenne, WY | reply to Cjaiceman
said by Cjaiceman:said by truocchio:I think the masses however will avoid this phone due to the $500-600 price tag plus being chained to Cingular for two years; I know that is the reason I am. Isn't this the story of Apple's life they come out with fantastic stuff but put it at a price point that scares people off, a 7 series BMW is a great car put if you have a KIA pocket book it just isn't going to happen,
--
The older I get the more I prefer the company of my dogs over that of man kind. |
|
1 edit | reply to kyramilan
The only way FairPlay is going to impact that iPhone is if users purchase content through the iTunes store - you can still fill the device with your own music and videos and there will be no copy protections whatsoever.
I, personally, am somewhat anti-DRM, but his complaint regarding DRM applies to ALL manufacturers who allow their devices to play purchased content. Considering the fact that the iPod is the leading portable music player (whether you believe they deserve that position or not) demonstrates that the FairPlay DRM is not stopping people from buying the device. How this author thinks that FairPlay is "fraught with problems" versus other protection schemes is beyond me.
EDIT "That's why so many people are installing Rockbox instead."
Define "so many users." Up until now, I have never seen anyone using Rockbox on their portable audio players, let alone it being mentioned in a popular publication. Ask the average iPod user what FairPlay is and they won't have a clue - it simply isn't an issue for most users. |
|
 NEP1611
join:2002-03-27
Northford, CT | reply to Lord_Black
said by Lord_Black:said by truocchio:I think the masses however will avoid this phone due to the $500-600 price tag Agree 100%. This thing is going to be $200-$300 before Christmas. At most. Write it down. |
|
| reply to Transmaster
The iphone isn't fantastic. I bought a dell axim 2 years ago and it plays movies, mp3s, and runs third party apps and games. Sure it's not a cellphone, but they have cellphones that run the same windows mobile OS. I can bet with 100% certainty that those phones which have probably been out for years are way better than the iphone. |
|
1 edit | reply to bthornhill
It's stable and secure because it's built on top of a UNIX derivative, not because Apple is that adept at securing its OS. |
|
| reply to gattaca
You appear to know NO teenagers. As a youth minister I have noticed that almost all my kids are using alternatives to iTunes. They dont seem to agree on which to use, but they dont like or user iTunes. The few that do use iTunes do so because they have some "reason" not to use 3rd party applications. Things like "My parents wont let me because they like iTunes" and "I dont wanna screw up my iPod" are the most common reasons. |
|
| The article was referring to replacement of the actual iPod firmware, not the iTunes software. I'll give you this - unlike iTunes on OS X, iTunes on Windows is relatively resource-hungry. If a system isn't running in tip-top shape, iTunes can falter. For that reason, I can understand people using alternatives to iTunes while on Windows.
I stand by what I said earlier - I have never seen any iPod user using an alternative firmware on the device over the past five years.
--
Been around the world and found
That only stupid people are breeding
The cretins cloning and feeding
And I don't even own a TV. |
|
