http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r17636047 en Tue, 09 Feb 2010 19:01:27 EDT Tue, 09 Feb 2010 19:01:27 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17638700 jdmatl : I use C/R with spamarrest.com. It is C/R with enhancements

Old arguements. newer technology has put aside most of these issues with C/R. it isn't selfish. how is clicking on a single URL one-time to authenticate you forever (unless revoked by enduser) selfish? Are we saying that people don't know how to click in URL's in email? ;)

Plus, C/R solutions offer the option to import your existing address book and whitelist entire domains.

Don't knock C/R unless you have tried it. C/R has blocked 100% of spam that made it past commercial server based solutions into my account.

For over a month I have had ZERO spam get into my inbox. and I get over 100 spam's a day directed to my domain. Server gets about 90% of the spam, SpamArrest gets the others. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17638700 Sun, 14 Jan 2007 09:32:01 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17636920 DaneJasper : Challenge/response might be a short term fix for the selfish end-user, but it's not a real solution. Read here for some of the issues.

»linuxmafia.com/faq/Mail/challeng···nse.html

-Dane]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17636920 Sat, 13 Jan 2007 21:43:47 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17636047 jdmatl : must be a slow news day. How many vendors have promised to do this? The only thing I have found close is spamarrest.com. Love it or hate it Challenge/Response works against zombie spam. ]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17636047 Sat, 13 Jan 2007 19:10:30 EDT