 M A R SPremium
join:2001-06-15
Long Island
 ·Optimum Online
2 edits | Lame Now it will be found all over the net for free. This is a dumb idea. One of the worst.
And this is the reason why they must do this, »en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarbanes-Oxley_Act ? |
|
| Complete BS!
So, by their account I can never get updated software (for a piece of hardware) with new features from a company w/o being charged for it? Sorry to say it's been done before and will be done in the future. Come up with another excuse Apple, this one doesn't fly.
Call a spade and spade here and say we want to charge you for it, that's all.
pjhofmann |
|
Stumbles
join:2002-12-17
Port Saint Lucie, FL | reply to M A R S
Yeah it's lame all right ...... on Apples part |
|
 chanurPremium
join:2001-02-26
Colorado Springs, CO | reply to M A R S
Anyone that buys this pile of Bull from Apple, I have a bridge to sell.
If it was even remotely true, why not $1? $.01? Its a revenue measure, nothing else. Why they feel the need to make up excuses, I have no idea. |
|
 sporkmedrop the crantini and move it, sisterPremium,MVM
join:2000-07-01
Morristown, NJ | reply to M A R S
There's a Blue Room in the white house?  |
|
|
|
| reply to M A R S
I do not get it...
If it is just software, then surely anyone could just make the "patch", no?
Besides, even when it is Apple's that is charging you money, it is still GWB's fault. Of course.
I mean everyone knows it is Halliburton who is behind the n-draft anyway.  |
|
