 ZZ
@kpylaajakaista.net
1 edit | Re: Inoccent or guilty? "Here's a question:
What exactly is wrong with a little boy seeing a naked woman
or a little girl seeing a naked man?
Our society has become so hung up on protecting our children from this so called "obscene" material. I mean, children at very young ages have natural hormones (sometimes raging) and strong curiosities embedded in their genetic makeup. Why does society want to oppress these curiosities instead of educating. Just look at the whole Janet Jackson BOOB fiasco. The American prudes were up in arms and they wanted heads lopped off because of that incident.
Last night, my wife and I were watching the reality show, Beauty and the geek. One of the challenges was that the guys had to use charcoal and draw a naked model that was in front of them. At the end of the challenge they showed the TV audience each drawing, and what do you think they did? That's right, they blurred a charcoal drawing of a naked woman. WTF is wrong with society?
Now I'll ask my question again:
What exactly is wrong with a little boy seeing a naked woman
or a little girl seeing a naked man?
And I dont want your predictable answer to be "It's just wrong" or " we don't want to corrupt our children"."
I'M with this guy, whether or not she did it on purpose... why the fuck is this kind of thing on trial?????????????? and who has taken it there... why should she do time??? even firing her would be exaggeration... suspend maybe. and i don't believe a second that those kids were harmed in anyway... I was only about 4 years old when I found my brothers porn mags... I looked at them... often, even with my friends who were the same age... i wasn't affected by any-means... i think  and I'm quite positive that my friends weren't either. In fact few months ago my ,almost 3 years old, son was reading porn mags which his older cousins had accidentally found under their dads bed...(of course we took them away from them)and I'm not the least concerned for my sons nor my nephews' mental health... and neither should the parents of those children who were "exposed".
And judging from the articles what i have read about this case the teacher is innocent... and the jury that has judged her should be shot (not to be taken seriously).
I sincerely hope that the judge who's working on the conviction has more common sense, and to let this teacher off with a warning... this kind of a idiotic behavior, to sue this teacher in the first place and not to handle it between the parents and the teacher, makes my blood boil..
excuse me for my bad english... 'cause it isn't my native language, nor do i live in the "States" |
