<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>20 years?!?!? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r17657869</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:47:00 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 08:47:00 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: 20 years?!?!?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17657922</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I believe that's the cost of setting it up and then running it for 20 years.<br>I hope ;)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17657922</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 11:05:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>20 years?!?!?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17657869</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1035739"><b>truocchio</b></A> : So they have a 20 years plan for the wi-fi network that will be obsolete and need to be completely changed out in 2 - 4 years....I wonder who pulled that amortization schedule out of their a$$.  <br><br>At least they are moving in the right direction, maybe they will even run fiber to nodes and provide the last mile with wi-fi/wi-max as they roll out the FTTH.  This would probably be a feasible plan where results can be seen quickly and plans to roll out to fiber would already be underway as the wi-fi life cycle burns out. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17657869</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:51:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
