<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>If it weren&#x27;t for the pre-draft stuff in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r17672236</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 00:04:15 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 00:04:15 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: If it weren&#x27;t for the pre-draft stuff</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17672784</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1376775"><b>Fox McCloud</b></A> : it's about time this got rolling....<br><br>Maybe we'll finally start seeing wireless networks with real-world throughputs above 100 meg (I know the currently draft-N can hit 70-90 meg, real world)...<br><br>So, when will the final "N" be approved?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17672784</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 15:50:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>If it weren&#x27;t for the pre-draft stuff</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17672236</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1046768"><b>ke4pym</b></A> : the IEEE would probably have taken a few more years to hammer this out.  Good for the vendors putting a little pressure on IEEE.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17672236</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2007 14:38:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
