<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>This makes me sick. in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r17678788</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 17:42:45 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 17:42:45 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>This makes me sick.</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17678788</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1432586"><b>Glocker</b></A> : What about the large city of western MA?? SPRINGFIELD!!! Springfield and Worcester need to be a separate state (the distribution of funding is WHACK!). It was o.k. for us to help fund the big dig though (largest, corrupt, fiasco in U.S. history, besides our current campaign of course). There is no word on a plan for Springfield to get lit with FIOS. I realize that it's a private company complaining about the capital and not the state that has to fund the expansion, but as always, we are last (like a step child). I bet we won't see the FIOS vans till mid 2009. Thankfully DSL and cable are available. My heart goes out to the smaller towns that don't even have those as an option. <br><br>WHAAA, WHAAA, WHAAA!!!!!  :( :( :mad: :mad:  :( :(]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17678788</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jan 2007 16:55:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
