 TigerNutzLaissez les bons temps roulerPremium
join:2000-12-23
Little Rock, AR | reply to dadkins
Re: Yep! yeah?
I'm sure the same thing was said about a 10mb file in 1997...... |
|
| Actually no. Most dialup services can grab that size of a file in less than an hour (give or take). Now a 100+MB file size however... |
|
|
|
 TopmounterSent By Grocery Clerks
join:2001-02-20
Evergreen, CO | reply to TigerNutz
Call me in 9 years then  |
|
| reply to TigerNutz
said by TigerNutz:yeah? I'm sure the same thing was said about a 10mb file in 1997...... In 97', I was still on dialup, and 10MB was not a big deal. |
|
| reply to TigerNutz
In 97 I think I could download at abot 3.9 KB's a second with my state of the art 56K modem. |
|
| I had a download rate of about 4.2KBps on average on my US Robotics 56k v.92 external modem back in the day.
Still have it.
--
True Happiness Must Come From Within |
|
 dslwanterIt's comingPremium
join:2002-12-16
Niles, OH
 ·AT&T Midwest
| reply to Corehhi
said by Corehhi:In 97 I think I could download at abot 3.9 KB's a second with my state of the art 56K modem. And sadly around here that's all most people know because we have the world's cheapest cable company and no live RTs to provide DSL. I'm the last one this far north up the road to have DSL.
--
"Whatsoever you do to the least of my people, that you do onto me!" Check out my internet radio station: »www.thebomb102.com |
|
 bbrlogueLearning New Things DailyPremium
join:2003-12-07
Alexandria, VA | reply to TigerNutz
Cable Modem in 97 In '97, I had cable modem. What 10Mb file? |
|
