republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Industry Forums » Wireless Service Providers » NAT behind NAT not a bad thing ?
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
my network places »
« How many client can be atached to RB500 with 4 minipci?  
AuthorAll Replies


superdog
I Need A Drink
Premium,MVM
join:2001-07-13
Lebanon, PA

reply to Airplane777
Re: NAT behind NAT not a bad thing ?

said by Airplane777 See Profile :

How do you get those public static IPs through your edge router (since I assume your edge router is NATed)? You do some kind of port forwarding? (Isn't an edge router the one connected directly to the modem that goes to the Internet backbone?) Or do you do bridging of your edge router also?
Bob, when You have a T1 or larger to the net, all of us use a router at the edge that basically bridges all of our static IP's right thru to the end user or at least to the CPE. If You are using DSL as a backhaul, You may only have 1 real world IP?, and that is used in Your modem. If that is the case?, You would then in all reality be NAT'ing 3 times?. Once at Your NOC, once at the CPE and then the 3rd time on Your customers router. This is a really bad idea. While I have seen VPN's work thru 2 NAT boxes, I have also seen some strange things happen to programs like Citrix(allows You to use a local computer to run a remote one across a VPN and special software). I would use that DLB2300 or Highgain CPE as a bridge. That way You are at least only NAT'ing twice. Once at the NOC(modem) and then again on the customers router.
--
»www.wavecrazy.net Join WISPA today! »www.wispa.org/

Airplane777

join:2004-06-20


2 edits
Thank you superdog, robbin, & cmaenginsb:

Bridging it is.

I had to do some thinking since this commercial establishment had their own wireless router. Your ideas on me doing bridging makes sense. So I just got done setting up a test DLB 2300 in bridge mode (just to make sure I can do it quickly on the clients CPE).

I finally got the CAT5 run yesterday. I'm using NPRM with my tripod tapconned to some concrete patio blocks, which are sitting on 3 rubber mats. Seems to work pretty good. I still may go up and put a sand bag on each concrete block. I'm hoping it will take a lot of wind without blowing over...lol.

This stuff is fun...especially when I was crawling around on the roof setting up the tripod when it was snowing a few days ago.

To make it even more fun, I'm doing MAC authentication, hidden SSID, and WPA 2...lol.
Forums » Industry Forums » Wireless Service Providersmy network places »
« How many client can be atached to RB500 with 4 minipci?  


Tuesday, 10-Nov 08:14:18 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [86] Verizon Keeps Swinging At AT&T
· [83] VoIP Over 3G Still Not Working For iPhone
· [33] Bill Would Force ISPs To Block Financial Scams
· [24] Mediacom Hints At 50, 100 Mbps Speeds
· [15] Clearwire To Get Another $1.5 Billion
· [11] Monday Evening Links
· [9] 15 States Have Now Gotten Broadband Mapping Money
· [6] AT&T Launching New 7.2 Mbps 3G Modem
· [0] Tuesday Morning Links
· [0] Google Offers Free Holiday Airport Wi-Fi
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· 60 Minutes piece on cyber security last night [Security]
· Opening a file download dialog from a JavaScript function. [Webmasters and Developers]
· Google Has Acquired Gizmo5 [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· A fishy CRTC tarriff filed by bell? [TekSavvy]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Microsoft Security Bulletin Summary for October 13, 2009 [Security]