Airplane777
join:2004-06-20
2 edits | reply to superdog
Re: NAT behind NAT not a bad thing ?
Thank you superdog, robbin, & cmaenginsb:
Bridging it is.
I had to do some thinking since this commercial establishment had their own wireless router. Your ideas on me doing bridging makes sense. So I just got done setting up a test DLB 2300 in bridge mode (just to make sure I can do it quickly on the clients CPE).
I finally got the CAT5 run yesterday. I'm using NPRM with my tripod tapconned to some concrete patio blocks, which are sitting on 3 rubber mats. Seems to work pretty good. I still may go up and put a sand bag on each concrete block. I'm hoping it will take a lot of wind without blowing over...lol.
This stuff is fun...especially when I was crawling around on the roof setting up the tripod when it was snowing a few days ago.
To make it even more fun, I'm doing MAC authentication, hidden SSID, and WPA 2...lol. |
