republican-creole
Search:  

 
theme to black backgroundlet page decide theme
HomeFind ServiceReviewsISP NewsFAQsForumsToolsDatabaseAbout 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Industry Forums » Wireless Service Providers » NAT behind NAT not a bad thing ?
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·WISP Forum FAQ ·WISP Directory ·WISP Forum Frappr Map ·Radio Mobile
my network places »
« How many client can be atached to RB500 with 4 minipci?  
Wisp

join:2005-09-07
Bryn Athyn, PA

Re: NAT behind NAT not a bad thing ?

We do it like Superdog says, NAT at the NOC, all aps are bridged, and then NAT again at the CPE. So far it's been ok.
permalink · 2007-01-25 16:40:10 · Reply to this
Forums » Industry Forums » Wireless Service Providersmy network places »
« How many client can be atached to RB500 with 4 minipci?  

Monday, 30-Nov 10:14:01 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [13] AT&T Top Lobbyist Cicconi Has His Feelings Hurt
· [12] Midcontinent Socked With Easement Lawsuit
· [11] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [3] Monday Morning Links
Most people now reading
· Are GPS's better today? [General Questions]
· Considering Leaving Vonage, who should I Consider? [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Why does it take so long? Mail question [General Questions]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· Options if ACTA is ratified [TekSavvy]
· Is Easynews down? [Filesharing Software]
· [ PVP] 3.2 DK PvP D/W Spec... [World of Warcraft]
· Whats the big deal about being "Old School"....? [World of Warcraft]
· Maximizing Rogue DPS for 3.1 [World of Warcraft]