Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Industry Forums » Wireless Service Providers » How many client can be atached to RB500 with 4 minipci?
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
NAT behind NAT not a bad thing ? »
« VoIP via WiFi  
AuthorAll Replies

final_target

join:2006-04-02
Westfield, NY

reply to final_target
Re: How many client can be atached to RB500 with 4 minipci?

Thank u John Galt,
MIkrotik Said here
"3-How many wireless clients/routers can be connected to one Base Station?
Up to 2007 wireless clients/routers. However, the system performance depends on the usage, i.e., number of computers using it. It all depends on the actual usage, how many computers are connected behind client routers and how much data is sent over. We have clients who have successfully installed around 100 clients to one Base Station. You can easily run an AP with even more sites connected, if you bandwidth shape them to ensure they get the required slice of bandwidth." but it is not clear!
I mean some device like "pocket pc" by "wifi support devices"? in other word I mean just mikrotik with its minipci can connect to AP or every 802.11(a or b or g) can be used?
thanks for you rep.


John Galt
Forward, March
Premium
join:2004-09-30
Happy Camp
·CenturyLink

Re: How many client can be attached to RB500 with 4 minipci?

Ah...I understand.

One of the problems is the use of words in one context while meaning something different. The Mikrotik quote demonstrates this. They say that 2007 can be "connected". What does THAT mean? They then go on to say that that they have clients (WISPs, I presume) that have "installed" around 100 to a Base Station. What does THAT mean?

I will let you sort that out by yourself. It is a good exercise in understanding WISPing.



What is really important is this: how many concurrent users can be supported simultaneously by the device? And, of course, the answer is....that depends.


--
A is A
Forums » Industry Forums » Wireless Service ProvidersNAT behind NAT not a bad thing ? »
« VoIP via WiFi  


Wednesday, 09-Dec 21:50:15 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [199] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [107] AT&T Launching New 24 Mbps U-Verse Tier
· [82] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [66] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [63] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [56] AT&T Hints At Usage-Based iPhone Data Pricing
· [51] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [44] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
Most people now reading
· Is sleeping similar to being dead? [General Questions]
· Adobe Flash Player version 10.0.42.34 [Security]
· Hot Girl falls face first down stairs [56k Lookout (Broadband Heavy)]
· Forwarding previous owner's mail [Home Repair & Improvement]
· ICC strats [World of Warcraft]
· whole house ups [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Comcast refused to install 400' feet. [Comcast HSI]
· ICC Strats??? [World of Warcraft]
· [WIN7] Outlook express under Windows 7? [Microsoft Help]