bumbo
join:2002-11-20
Corunna, ON
| reply to weales
Re: Odd DSL Line Stats
I honestly believe it will, the Gnet's are flaky at the best of conditions, downright atrocious at marginal lines, that's where the trusty Speedtouch comes into play, if it's attainable and doable the Speedtouch will do it..
--
Check out the TekSavvy Forums:
»TekSavvy Solutions Inc. |
|
lookatthings
@bell.ca | why dont you jsut go with the best line and set things up ireless based on that feed. if its only one floor no need to be paying two dsl feeds....you ll make up the price of a wireless card in a month or two |
|
weales
join:2002-06-30
1 edit | 
Speedtouch 516 | 
Gnet B00060 |
Well since switching over to the speedtouch 516, I haven't noticed a drop yet. I went and downloaded 2 DMT versions for each modem and it appears (If I read it correctly) I'm getting a better margin signal with the speedtouch. |
|
bumbo
join:2002-11-20
Corunna, ON | That sticks to what I've gathered (information-wise) about the two.... |
|
TilhasBB
Formally Goden99
Premium
join:2000-08-05
canada | Weird...
57.5/31.5 13/11
55.5/31.5 11/6
the noise margin increased but the attunation droped with the speedtouch. |
|
bumbo
join:2002-11-20
Corunna, ON
| Strange, after re-looking, I noticed that too....I must've missed that...
Let us know anyways how the drops thing goes....
--
Check out the TekSavvy Forums:
»TekSavvy Solutions Inc. |
|
rbdwarf
join:2007-01-21
Montreal, QC
| reply to TilhasBB
said by TilhasBB  :the noise margin increased but the attunation droped with the speedtouch. You want the noise margin to be higher and the attenuation to be lower - that's a good thing.
--
Rob |
|
bumbo
join:2002-11-20
Corunna, ON | yes, but he was pointing out the attn went from 55.5 to 57.5
(I understood you tilhas)
--
Check out the TekSavvy Forums:
»TekSavvy Solutions Inc. |
|
