Re: Why.. - dslreports.com

Yauch join:2005-06-24	reply to Tzale Re: Why.. That's an excellent point, but Ball State isn't a large campus. I've seen much smaller, but if client connections and signals inside buildings weren't an issue, a single wi-fi point could cover this entire campus too.
	to forum · permalink · · 2007-01-29 09:03:12 ·
Michieru2 zzz zzz zzz Premium join:2005-01-28 Miami, FL	reply to Tzale It will be cheaper to use 802.11n equipment which has better throughput than WiMAX at 120Mbps and the upgrade is still cheap. I know of one vendor who quoted me for a WiMAX card of at least 80 dollars and the AP at around 200 dollars. I believe it was Zyxel. -- The only limits we have are the one's we set ourselves.
	to forum · permalink · · 2007-01-28 21:46:28 ·
Tzale Proud Libertarian Conservative Premium join:2004-01-06 Sweden ·Verizon FIOS ·Optimum Online	reply to Michieru2 said by Michieru2 : Why? What's wrong with WiFi it makes perfect sense for small scale deployment such as a college campus while WiMAX will make sense for city wide projects. It's like everyone is doing crap backwards and on top of that everyone has at least a 802.11b/g card these days on there laptop or there desktop. Yeah, but some college campuses can be as big as a small city/town. At least the vast ones with a lot of living green things, heh.... And I'm not talking about the sick college drunks. -Tzale -- -Virtual Pirate-
	to forum · permalink · · 2007-01-28 20:47:49 ·


Wednesday, 09-Dec 20:47:14	Terms of Use \| Privacy Policy \| Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo \| feedback \| contact over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole page compression OFF