<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Wow in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r17731311</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:41:37 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:41:37 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Wow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17743983</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/593611"><b>sweintz</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  TKJunkMail <A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><BR><BR><div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Jim Gurd <A HREF="/useremail/u/170742"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>And how much of that bandwidth is spam?<br> </DIV>Spam is an infitesimal amount of consumed bandwidth. It is a huge part of email traffic, but email traffic is a very small part of overall ISP traffic.<br> </DIV>True, but think about the fact that most spam is now sent from 0\/\/n3d or trojaned PC boxes running windows - the owner of the PC does not even now their machine is spewing spam. <br><br>I think in *SOME* cases, some of these "hogs" could actually be zombied PC's, spewing spam as fast as the outgoing pipe will allow.<br><br>Are they using much more upstream than downstream? If so, they might be zombies.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17743983</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:34:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Wow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17738763</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/811675"><b>cdru</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  BVT <A HREF="/useremail/u/1098821"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>Any real man can juggle a porn habit and a girlfriend or wife.</DIV>What's a lot tougher is juggling a porn habit and a girlfriend <B>and</B> a wife.<br><SMALL>--<br>Go Colts</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17738763</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:19:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Wow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17737828</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1098821"><b>BVT</b></A> : Any real man can juggle a porn habit and a girlfriend or wife.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17737828</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 13:52:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Wow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17735242</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/698757"><b>nixen</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  newyorkslick <A HREF="/useremail/u/542689"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>I don't think very much. Even though there is a crapload of<br>spam, BT downloads makes up most of it, and I can assume 1/3rd of those BT downloads are porn.<br> </DIV>Given that porn has driven the growth of the Internet even since the beginning (whether people want to acknowledge it or not), it wouldn't be surprising that <I>at least</I> 1/3 of the hogged bandwidth was porn.<br><br>-tom<br><SMALL>--<br>"Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the government's purposes are beneficial. The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well meaning but without understanding." -Louis D Brandeis</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17735242</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 00:06:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Wow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17733259</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1261640"><b>bbskeptic</b></A> : It's all BitTorrent and P2P apps.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17733259</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:48:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Wow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17732658</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1416485"><b>kyramilan</b></A> : 5% of users (aka "bandwidth hogs") generate 45.3% of traffic (which are mainly porn downloads). So 5% are basically perverts and the 40% lite users have girlfriends? Yep! :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17732658</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 17:18:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Wow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17732127</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/542689"><b>newyorkslick</b></A> : I don't think very much. Even though there is a crapload of<br>spam, BT downloads makes up most of it, and I can assume 1/3rd of those BT downloads are porn.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17732127</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:01:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Wow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17731563</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/641535"><b>BIGMIKE</b></A> : Bandwidth hogs = JOB SECURITY]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17731563</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 14:40:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Wow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17731323</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>TKJunkMail</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by  Jim Gurd <A HREF="/useremail/u/170742"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</SMALL><br><br>And how much of that bandwidth is spam?<br> </DIV>Spam is an infitesimal amount of consumed bandwidth. It is a huge part of email traffic, but email traffic is a very small part of overall ISP traffic.<br><SMALL>--<br>--<BR><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h">My BLOG</A><BR><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto">My Web Page</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17731323</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:55:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Wow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17731311</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/170742"><b>Jim Gurd</b></A> : And how much of that bandwidth is spam?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17731311</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:53:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Wow</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17731296</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/186811"><b>brianiscool</b></A> : How can consumers value from these statistics?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,17731296</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:50:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
