Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » The Infamous 'Up To' Broadband Qualifier » Absolutely!!!
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
No easy answer »
« Legislation/policy that CAN'T possibly be enforced is...  
AuthorAll Replies


DownTheShore
Tar and Feather Joe Lieberman
Premium
join:2003-12-02
Beautiful NJ
clubs:

reply to smcallah
Re: Absolutely!!!

But it would be nice if we were at least given a realistic number. My OOL speeds are supposed to be "up to" 15/2 Mbps, but on good days I usually only run 9/1 Mbps; most days my download speed is lower. To me, that 15/2 number is false advertising. I'd've liked to have seen my TOS at least include a realistic average speed for my area.
--
Life is simply one damned thing after another.

smcallah

join:2004-08-05
Home

And the speed for your area could change, at any time. Heck, the speed for just YOUR HOUSE, can change, depending on what could be wrong.

If they can prove that their speed actually works "up to" what they say, I see no reason that they can't advertise it as such.

The one thing that all providers though need to remove from their ads or TOS is "unlimited service."

Everyone gets confused on that one.


DownTheShore
Tar and Feather Joe Lieberman
Premium
join:2003-12-02
Beautiful NJ
clubs:

said by smcallah See Profile :

And the speed for your area could change, at any time. Heck, the speed for just YOUR HOUSE, can change, depending on what could be wrong.

If they can prove that their speed actually works "up to" what they say, I see no reason that they can't advertise it as such.

The one thing that all providers though need to remove from their ads or TOS is "unlimited service."

Everyone gets confused on that one.
I understand that the speeds are influenced by other events, particularly node overloads etc. But in my case, as far as I've been able to determine, there's nothing wrong at my end, so I'm talking about people who are in similar circumstances.

If, realistically, the customer is never going to get those advertised speeds, advertising it as such is akin to those "speedy weight loss" pills advertised on TV. At least those are required to clearly include a disclaimer that those people who drop a lot of weight are atypical.
--
Life is simply one damned thing after another.
Forums » The Infamous 'Up To' Broadband QualifierNo easy answer »
« Legislation/policy that CAN'T possibly be enforced is...  


Tuesday, 10-Nov 09:06:26 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [89] Verizon Keeps Swinging At AT&T
· [84] VoIP Over 3G Still Not Working For iPhone
· [33] Bill Would Force ISPs To Block Financial Scams
· [24] Mediacom Hints At 50, 100 Mbps Speeds
· [16] Clearwire To Get Another $1.5 Billion
· [12] Monday Evening Links
· [10] 15 States Have Now Gotten Broadband Mapping Money
· [6] AT&T Launching New 7.2 Mbps 3G Modem
· [2] Sprint Announces Job Cuts
· [1] Google Offers Free Holiday Airport Wi-Fi
Most people now reading
· A fishy CRTC tarriff filed by bell? [TekSavvy]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· 60 Minutes piece on cyber security last night [Security]
· How in the world am I going to get into college? [General Questions]
· Blown out Ballasts [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Microsoft Security Bulletin Summary for October 13, 2009 [Security]
· [SU] Apple Releases Mac OS X 10.6.2 [All Things Macintosh]
· Sigh...time to switch from WindowMaker [All Things Unix]
· Wood floor opinion... [Home Repair & Improvement]