site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
178
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

davidbrown

join:2005-05-31
Toronto, ON

hmmmmm

The real issues for us is not bt its our providers.

We have only two for example in toronto rogers and bll.

There our other dsl ones but they get it from bell so it ends up the same in the end.

Both are basicly a joke for the most part and way behind what you get in the states or elsewhere.

Rogers is badly oversold and outdated and bell is badly run and outdated.

So we end up with bt being choked and caps to keep the whole unstable mess running.

Bt isn't going away and both rogers and bell are going to have to figure out a better solution to things beyound what there doing now.

This is made more important with so many companies and industries using bt now.

We need more providers and then we shall see some serious service for our money but not tell then.


ClassAction

@dsl.bell.ca

Whats more interesting is that as Rogers killed encrypted BT, while Bell-Sympatico (the only competition to Rogers) adds a BandWidth cap of 30-gigs.

Now both being part of the Canadian Association of Internet Providers (changed to CATA now), and do this at the same time, one has to wonder if their is some *fixing* going on with Canadian internet.

Either price fixing or bandwidth fixing, and/or cost of. Seems to much of a coincidence for both COMPETITORS to do this at the same time.


Monday, 28-May 08:41:57 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics